Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: too many indexes and missing indexes #621

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

fix: too many indexes and missing indexes #621

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

gfyrag
Copy link
Contributor

@gfyrag gfyrag commented Dec 19, 2024

No description provided.

@gfyrag gfyrag requested a review from a team as a code owner December 19, 2024 10:50
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the DefaultBucket struct in the storage bucket implementation and the addition of a new database index for account metadata. The modifications remove several index creation entries related to transaction and account indexes, and introduce new trigger definitions for handling transactions and accounts. A concurrent GIN index is added to optimize querying of the account metadata JSONB column.

Changes

File Change Summary
internal/storage/bucket/default_bucket.go Removed multiple index creation entries for transactions and accounts. Added new trigger definitions for transaction and account operations.
internal/storage/bucket/migrations/24-accounts-metadata-index/up.sql Created a concurrent GIN index accounts_metadata_idx on the metadata column of the accounts table to improve query performance.

Poem

🐰 Indexes trimmed, triggers anew,
Metadata dancing in database's view,
Concurrent magic, performance so bright,
Rabbit's code leaps with algorithmic might!
Storage evolves, efficiency gleams ✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between faf326e and bdf7189.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • docker-compose.yml is excluded by !**/*.yml
  • internal/storage/bucket/migrations/24-accounts-metadata-index/notes.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • internal/storage/bucket/default_bucket.go (0 hunks)
  • internal/storage/bucket/migrations/24-accounts-metadata-index/up.sql (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • internal/storage/bucket/default_bucket.go
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • internal/storage/bucket/migrations/24-accounts-metadata-index/up.sql

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@gfyrag gfyrag added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit ea3c6b9 Dec 19, 2024
14 checks passed
@gfyrag gfyrag deleted the fix/indexes branch December 19, 2024 15:43
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants