Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: account encoding at api level #600

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024
Merged

fix: account encoding at api level #600

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

gfyrag
Copy link
Contributor

@gfyrag gfyrag commented Dec 5, 2024

No description provided.

@gfyrag gfyrag requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2024 12:22
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve a modification to the Account struct in the internal/account.go file. Specifically, the JSON tag for the InsertionDate field has been changed from json:"_" to json:"-", which prevents this field from being serialized into JSON. The rest of the struct remains unchanged, and no modifications were made to the AccountsVolumes struct.

Changes

File Change Summary
internal/account.go Updated JSON tag for InsertionDate field from json:"_" to json:"-" in Account struct.

Poem

In the meadow where rabbits play,
Changes come to brighten the day.
With fields now hidden from JSON's gaze,
We hop along in joyful praise! 🐇✨
A little tweak, a leap so grand,
In our code, we make our stand!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 90cb10b and e7d0d72.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal/account.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
internal/account.go (1)

20-20: LGTM! Consistent handling of internal timestamps

The change from json:"_" to json:"-" for InsertionDate aligns with how other internal timestamp fields are handled in the struct (FirstUsage, UpdatedAt). This properly prevents the internal metadata from being exposed in API responses.

Let's verify if this breaking change might affect API clients:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can make a final determination. The search shows that:

  1. The InsertionDate field is only used internally:

    • It's used in database queries via the bun ORM tag
    • It's used as a query parameter (useInsertionDate) for filtering data
    • No code is found that expects the field in JSON responses
  2. The change from json:"_" to json:"-" is safe because:

    • No test cases were found expecting the "_" field in JSON responses
    • No API handlers were found that explicitly expose this field
    • Other timestamp fields in the same struct also use json:"-"

Change is safe - no API clients affected

The change from json:"_" to json:"-" for the InsertionDate field is safe as there's no evidence of API clients relying on this field. The field is purely used for internal database operations and query filtering.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for any API handlers or tests that might be relying on the "_" field in JSON responses

# Search for any references to the insertion_date field in API handlers
rg -A 5 "insertion_date|InsertionDate" --type go

# Search for JSON response assertions in tests that might expect the "_" field
rg -A 5 '"_":' --type json --type go

Length of output: 43288


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@gfyrag gfyrag added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 5, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 0c39058 Dec 5, 2024
9 checks passed
@gfyrag gfyrag deleted the fix/account-encoding branch December 5, 2024 12:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants