Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: [evmos] upgrade evmos to v10.0.0 and proposals parsing to correctly parse v0.46.x gov proposals #519

Merged
merged 32 commits into from
Feb 7, 2023

Conversation

MonikaCat
Copy link
Contributor

@MonikaCat MonikaCat commented Feb 1, 2023

Description

Closes: #XXXX
BDU-731


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@MonikaCat MonikaCat changed the title feat: [evmos] updated proposals parsing feat: [evmos] update proposals parsing Feb 1, 2023
@MonikaCat MonikaCat changed the title feat: [evmos] update proposals parsing feat: [evmos] upgrade evmos to v10.0.0 and proposals parsing to correctly parse gov v1 module proposals Feb 2, 2023
@MonikaCat MonikaCat marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2023 04:34
@MonikaCat MonikaCat added the automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass label Feb 3, 2023
@MonikaCat MonikaCat requested a review from RiccardoM February 3, 2023 04:55
@RiccardoM
Copy link
Contributor

@MonikaCat Can you fix the linting please?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (chains/evmos/mainnet@ef47f0e). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@                   Coverage Diff                   @@
##             chains/evmos/mainnet     #519   +/-   ##
=======================================================
  Coverage                        ?   54.80%           
=======================================================
  Files                           ?       20           
  Lines                           ?     1518           
  Branches                        ?        0           
=======================================================
  Hits                            ?      832           
  Misses                          ?      582           
  Partials                        ?      104           

@MonikaCat MonikaCat requested review from RiccardoM and removed request for RiccardoM February 6, 2023 10:30
@MonikaCat MonikaCat changed the title feat: [evmos] upgrade evmos to v10.0.0 and proposals parsing to correctly parse gov v1 module proposals feat: [evmos] upgrade evmos to v10.0.0 and proposals parsing to correctly parse v0.46.x gov proposals Feb 7, 2023
@RiccardoM RiccardoM merged commit c7ca1f1 into chains/evmos/mainnet Feb 7, 2023
@RiccardoM RiccardoM deleted the dev/evmos-v10 branch February 7, 2023 14:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Automatically merge PR once all prerequisites pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants