Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run Safari Technology Preview for PRs #5

Closed
wants to merge 68 commits into from
Closed

Run Safari Technology Preview for PRs #5

wants to merge 68 commits into from

Conversation

foolip
Copy link
Owner

@foolip foolip commented Oct 3, 2018

No description provided.

@foolip
Copy link
Owner Author

foolip commented Oct 4, 2018

Searching for "SafariTechnologyPreview.dmg" I've found other interesting things:

@foolip
Copy link
Owner Author

foolip commented Oct 10, 2018

Oh cool, I made it work in Azure Pipelines :D https://dev.azure.com/foolip/foolip/_build/results?buildId=32&view=logs

@foolip
Copy link
Owner Author

foolip commented Oct 10, 2018

Note to self: use https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1425698 to debug Ahem problem.

@foolip
Copy link
Owner Author

foolip commented Oct 20, 2018

Conclusions from the experiments in this PR are in Extending wpt's CI coverage. I'll be starting a new PR for Azure Pipelines only.

@foolip foolip closed this Oct 20, 2018
@foolip foolip deleted the macos-ci branch October 20, 2018 18:15
foolip pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2019
chromedriver doesn't allow changing Object.prototype to add enumerable
properties, but this test requires setting some values on
Object.prototype.  When Object.prototype.a is set to:

  {b: {c: 'on proto'}}

chromedriver fails with:

    JavascriptErrorException: javascript error (500): Maximum call stack size exceeded
      (Session info: chrome=72.0.3626.121)

    Remote-end stacktrace:

    #0 0x563ff3a32a59 <unknown>
    #1 0x563ff39cb7f3 <unknown>
    #2 0x563ff38fcd7c <unknown>
    #3 0x563ff38ff78c <unknown>
    #4 0x563ff38ff5f7 <unknown>
    #5 0x563ff38ffbe7 <unknown>
    #6 0x563ff38fff1b <unknown>
    #7 0x563ff38a3f7a <unknown>
    #8 0x563ff3899bf2 <unknown>
    #9 0x563ff38a37b7 <unknown>
    #10 0x563ff3899ac3 <unknown>
    #11 0x563ff38782d2 <unknown>
    #12 0x563ff3879112 <unknown>
    #13 0x563ff39fe865 <unknown>
    #14 0x563ff39ff32b <unknown>
    #15 0x563ff39ff70c <unknown>
    #16 0x563ff39d940a <unknown>
    #17 0x563ff39ff997 <unknown>
    #18 0x563ff39e9947 <unknown>
    #19 0x563ff3a1a800 <unknown>
    #20 0x563ff3a3c8be <unknown>
    #21 0x7f3bf4545494 start_thread
    #22 0x7f3bf2d58a8f clone

    Ran 1 tests finished in 2.0 seconds.
      • 0 ran as expected. 0 tests skipped.
      • 1 tests had errors unexpectedly

Work around this problem by cleaning up the test environment so
Object.prototype no longer has the override by the time chromedriver
tries to inspect the test result.

While here, fix the other tests to use the t.add_cleanup() function
so they'll cleanup their test environment in case they exit in
some other way besides reaching t.done().

The underlying chromedriver issue is tracked upstream at
https://crbug.com/chromedriver/2555.

Bug: 934844
Change-Id: Id1b4ab2a908bfbc001e2a2d045eeec3ef01c24d9
foolip pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2024
Since @page border box layout objects aren't in the the layout tree, any
code that wants to walk up the tree to find the containing block will be
in for a surprise.

This would happen if percentage-based @page padding was used [1].
Recomputing padding during painting when we have already done it during
layout is rather pointless anyway. Read it out directly from the
fragment.

[1] #1 blink::LayoutBox::ContainingBlockLogicalWidthForContent()
    #2 blink::LayoutBoxModelObject::ComputedCSSPadding()
    #3 blink::LayoutBoxModelObject::PaddingTop()
    #4 blink::LayoutBoxModelObject::PaddingOutsets()
    #5 blink::BoxPainterBase::PaintFillLayer()
    #6 blink::BoxPainterBase::PaintFillLayers()
    #7 blink::BoxFragmentPainter::PaintBackground()

Bug: 40286153
Change-Id: I1e6e92c2ce1d81aab2673ec9a877eac455534102
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5526469
Commit-Queue: Morten Stenshorne <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Xianzhu Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ian Kilpatrick <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1300711}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant