You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The reason for this is that kerning_for_non_ligated_sequences only parses Format 1 (glyph pair) subtables, not Format 2 (class pair) subtables. So any class-based kerning pairs will not be noticed.
I'm not convinced about this check anyway. It only makes sense for Latin fonts, and it's not clear to me that "has a ligature" equals "needs kerning". I think it's better achieved through other means. ("Is there kerning between Latin pairs which usually have kerning?")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: