Add interruptible override to execution #minor

[MorpheusXAUT]

TL;DR

Adds an interruptible flag to the ExecutionSpec, allowing for workflows to be flagged as interruptible for a single execution.

Type

• Bug Fix
• Feature
• Plugin

Are all requirements met?

• Code completed
• Smoke tested
• Unit tests added
• Code documentation added
• Any pending items have an associated Issue

Complete description

An additional field has been added to the ExecutionSpec, allowing for the interruptible flag of a workflow to be override for a single execution (existing overrides on task level still remain in place). Default value of false falls back to workflow/task config.
The override is internally passed along via the WorkflowExecutionSpec in flyteadmin, some interfaces require the LaunchPlanSpec to implement the interruptible flag as well, although it is currently not used.

Tracking Issue

flyteorg/flyte#2284

Follow-up issue

NA

[welcome]

Thank you for opening this pull request! 🙌

These tips will help get your PR across the finish line:

• Most of the repos have a PR template; if not, fill it out to the best of your knowledge.
• Sign off your commits (Reference: DCO Guide).

[katrogan]

looks good, just one nit with comments!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #287 (de51e71) into master (237f025) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #287   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.77%   74.77%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines         991      991           
=======================================
  Hits          741      741           
  Misses        218      218           
  Partials       32       32           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	75.02% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 237f025...de51e71. Read the comment docs.

[MorpheusXAUT]

Not quite sure why the generate test fails, DELTA_CHECK=true make generate shows everything being fine locally for me 🤔
@katrogan any ideas? looks like some ordering of the generated documentation changed locally on my machine... Re-running make generate doesn't change anything for me though.

[EngHabu]

This could be due to difference in tooling versions... Make sure you're using the same versions used in CI... Apologies about that

[MorpheusXAUT]

@EngHabu Just re-generated the same on my Windows instead of Linux machine, seems to be working now... Not sure what exactly changed, as I believe I've installed the identical versions in both environments, but I'll have another look at that tomorrow.
Should go good now though 🙂

[katrogan]

@EngHabu mind reviewing too?

[MorpheusXAUT]

@katrogan @hamersaw Any way to get this merged so I can update the other outstanding PRs with the updated version? 🙂