Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving from flytepropeller - [flytepropeller] Support attribute access on promises #4150

Closed

Conversation

eapolinario
Copy link
Contributor

See flyteorg/flyteidl#439

Tracking Issue

#3864

ByronHsu and others added 7 commits September 10, 2023 17:46
Signed-off-by: byhsu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: byhsu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: byhsu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: byhsu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Apolinario <[email protected]>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 3, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d9586b0) 58.98% compared to head (27a776f) 63.27%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4150      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.98%   63.27%   +4.29%     
==========================================
  Files         619      259     -360     
  Lines       52804    19455   -33349     
==========================================
- Hits        31146    12310   -18836     
+ Misses      19174     6259   -12915     
+ Partials     2484      886    -1598     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 63.27% <ø> (+4.29%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 360 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@eapolinario
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #4232.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants