Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(rpc): define auth protobuf package and Authentication model #1093

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 26, 2022

Conversation

GeorgeMac
Copy link
Member

This supports #779

This is a foundational PR which establishes a core Authentication model in protobuf.
Along with establishing a new rpc/flipt/auth protobuf definitions sub-package.

There's no functional value to this PR yet. It will be integrated in a subsequent PR.

@markphelps
Copy link
Collaborator

Should we create a short lived feature branch to base this off of instead of main so that if we need to we can still release from main until this feature is in a workable state?

I realize the irony of this

@GeorgeMac
Copy link
Member Author

@markphelps yeah, works for me. I'll base this off something like authentication.

I'll keep opening them as PRs on that branch? To aid in breaking up the review process.
Since it will touch as few places along the way.

@GeorgeMac GeorgeMac changed the base branch from main to authentication October 25, 2022 08:15
@GeorgeMac
Copy link
Member Author

I cut a branch authentication and based this PR on that 👍

@GeorgeMac GeorgeMac requested a review from markphelps October 26, 2022 12:21
@GeorgeMac GeorgeMac force-pushed the gm/authentication-protobuf branch from 8fe812d to ade17a7 Compare October 26, 2022 12:21
Copy link
Collaborator

@markphelps markphelps left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🪩

@GeorgeMac GeorgeMac merged commit 7bed8f3 into authentication Oct 26, 2022
@GeorgeMac GeorgeMac deleted the gm/authentication-protobuf branch October 26, 2022 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants