Create workflow for generate puml #109
Conversation
…вления интеграциями
…m/firstBitSportivnaya/PSSL into create-workflow-for-generate-puml # Conflicts: # docs/ERДиаграммаПодсистемыУправленияИнтеграциями.md
…m/firstBitSportivnaya/PSSL into create-workflow-for-generate-puml
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow file has been added to automate the generation of PlantUML diagrams upon repository push events. Additionally, two new documentation files have been created: one containing an ER diagram for the integration management subsystem and another detailing the entities and relationships within that subsystem. The introduced entities include various components related to integrations, along with their attributes and relationships. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Analysis Details0 Issues
Coverage and Duplications
Project ID: PSSL |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs/puml/ERArchitectureIntegrationsSubsystem.puml (2)
202-208: Clarify the placeholders in the predefined integration settings table.In the note section (lines 202-208), the table contains placeholders like
<пустая ссылка>,<путь к серверу>, and<идентификатор>. If these are intended to be filled in by users or represent variable values, consider adding a note to clarify this and avoid confusion. Alternatively, provide example values if applicable.
11-11: Consider defining foreign keys for the "ИдентификаторНастройки" field across entities.The field "ИдентификаторНастройки" appears in multiple entities (
eSysInton line 11,eIntSettingson line 27, andeIntFlowson line 81) but is currently defined as a string without foreign key relationships. If these fields are meant to reference the same data or establish a linkage between entities, consider defining them as foreign keys to ensure data integrity and clarity in relationships.Also applies to: 27-27, 81-81
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
docs/images/ERArchitectureIntegrationsSubsystem.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/generate-puml-svg.yml (1 hunks)
- docs/ERДиаграммаПодсистемыУправленияИнтеграциями.md (1 hunks)
- docs/puml/ERArchitectureIntegrationsSubsystem.puml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docs/ERДиаграммаПодсистемыУправленияИнтеграциями.md
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/generate-puml-svg.yml (3)
1-2: LGTM: Workflow name and trigger are appropriate.The workflow name "generate plantuml" clearly describes its purpose, and triggering on push events ensures that PlantUML diagrams are automatically updated whenever changes are pushed to the repository.
12-15: LGTM: Checkout step is well-configured.The checkout step is using the latest version of the action (
actions/checkout@v4) and efficiently setsfetch-depth: 1to only retrieve the latest commit. This configuration is appropriate for the task at hand.
17-23: Consider updating action version and improving commit message.The PlantUML generation step is generally well-configured, but there are a couple of points to consider:
The action version (
v1.5) might not be the latest. It's worth checking if there's a newer version available for potential improvements or bug fixes.The commit message could be more descriptive to provide better context in the repository history.
Consider updating the step as follows:
- name: Generate PlantUML diagrams id: plantuml uses: grassedge/[email protected] # Verify if this is the latest version with: message: "Update PlantUML diagrams in docs/images" path: docs/images env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}Let's verify if there's a newer version of the action:
If a newer version is available, consider updating to it for potential improvements and bug fixes.
docs/puml/ERArchitectureIntegrationsSubsystem.puml (1)
176-178: Confirm the correctness of recursive relationships for parent hierarchies.The entities
eSysIntandeIntSettingshave self-referential relationships defined throughРодитель(lines 176 and 178). Ensure that recursive relationships are correctly represented and handled in your data model, and that the ER diagram accurately reflects the intended hierarchical structure.
| generate_plantuml: | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| permissions: | ||
| contents: write | ||
| pull-requests: write | ||
| repository-projects: write |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider reviewing and limiting permissions.
The job configuration looks good overall, with a clear name and appropriate runner. However, the current permissions seem broader than necessary for generating PlantUML diagrams.
Consider limiting the permissions to only what's required for this specific task. For example:
permissions:
contents: writeThis should be sufficient for committing the generated SVG files. The pull-requests and repository-projects permissions may not be necessary unless there are specific requirements not evident from the current workflow.
| eIntHistory --> eSysInt : ИнтегрируемаяСистема | ||
| eIntHistory --> eIntStatuses : Статус | ||
| eIntHistory --> eIntFormates : ФорматИнтеграции | ||
| eIntHistory --> eIntFlows : ИнтреграционныйПоток |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the typo in the relationship label "ИнтреграционныйПоток".
There is a typo in the relationship label on line 194. "ИнтреграционныйПоток" should be "ИнтеграционныйПоток" to match the correct spelling.
Apply the following diff to fix the typo:
-eIntHistory --> eIntFlows : ИнтреграционныйПоток
+eIntHistory --> eIntFlows : ИнтеграционныйПотокCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| eIntHistory --> eIntFlows : ИнтреграционныйПоток | |
| eIntHistory --> eIntFlows : ИнтеграционныйПоток |
|
|
||
| eIntHistory --> eSysInt : ИнтегрируемаяСистема | ||
| eIntHistory --> eIntStatuses : Статус | ||
| eIntHistory --> eIntFormates : ФорматИнтеграции |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update the relationship to use the corrected enumeration alias "eIntFormats".
Following the correction of the alias, please update the relationship on line 193 to reference "eIntFormats".
Apply the following diff:
-eIntHistory --> eIntFormates : ФорматИнтеграции
+eIntHistory --> eIntFormats : ФорматИнтеграцииCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| eIntHistory --> eIntFormates : ФорматИнтеграции | |
| eIntHistory --> eIntFormats : ФорматИнтеграции |
| + ОшибкаЗагрузки | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| enum "Перечисление: Форматы интеграции" as eIntFormates { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the enumeration alias from "eIntFormates" to "eIntFormats".
The alias "eIntFormates" on line 152 appears to be misspelled. It should be "eIntFormats" to correctly reflect the term "Formats" and maintain consistency in naming conventions.
Apply the following diff to correct the alias:
-enum "Перечисление: Форматы интеграции" as eIntFormates {
+enum "Перечисление: Форматы интеграции" as eIntFormats {Also, please update all references to "eIntFormates" accordingly.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| enum "Перечисление: Форматы интеграции" as eIntFormates { | |
| enum "Перечисление: Форматы интеграции" as eIntFormats { |
#101 добавлен воркфлоу генерации .svg-файлов из .puml. Добавлена ER-диаграмма подсистемы управления интеграциями в документацию
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation