Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor update #225

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Minor update #225

wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

vinhloc30796
Copy link

Add short description to guide how to find mapping between method name to method number

@frrist
Copy link
Member

frrist commented Dec 6, 2022

Thanks for getting this started @vinhloc30796 ❤️. You can now rebase this onto master, the changes this was based on have merged.

@frrist
Copy link
Member

frrist commented Dec 6, 2022

Here are some ideas for the layout for message number to method name mapping::

Miner Actor

Codes

Version Code
0 bafkqaetgnfwc6mjpon2g64tbm5sw22lomvza
2 bafkqaetgnfwc6mrpon2g64tbm5sw22lomvza
3 bafkqaetgnfwc6mzpon2g64tbm5sw22lomvza
4 bafkqaetgnfwc6nbpon2g64tbm5sw22lomvza
5 bafkqaetgnfwc6njpon2g64tbm5sw22lomvza
6 bafkqaetgnfwc6nrpon2g64tbm5sw22lomvza
7 bafkqaetgnfwc6nzpon2g64tbm5sw22lomvza
8 bafk2bzacea6rabflc7kpwr6y4lzcqsnuahr4zblyq3rhzrrsfceeiw2lufrb4
9 bafk2bzacebz4na3nq4gmumghegtkaofrv4nffiihd7sxntrryfneusqkuqodm

Methods

Method Name Method Number
Constructor 1
ControlAddresses 2
ChangeWorkerAddress 3
ChangePeerID 4
SubmitWindowedPoSt 5
PreCommitSector 6
ProveCommitSector 7
ExtendSectorExpiration 8
TerminateSectors 9
DeclareFaults 10
DeclareFaultsRecovered 11
OnDeferredCronEvent 12
CheckSectorProven 13
ApplyRewards 14
ReportConsensusFault 15
WithdrawBalance 16
ConfirmSectorProofsValid 17
ChangeMultiaddrs 18
CompactPartitions 19
CompactSectorNumbers 20
ConfirmUpdateWorkerKey 21
RepayDebt 22
ChangeOwnerAddress 23
DisputeWindowedPoSt 24
PreCommitSectorBatch 25
ProveCommitAggregate 26
ProveReplicaUpdates 27

Account Actor

Codes

// TODO

Methods

Method Name Method Number
Constructor 1
PubkeyAddress 2

Cron Actor

Codes

// TODO

Methods

Method Name Method Number
Constructor 1
EpochTick 2

Init Actor

Codes

// TODO

Methods

Method Name Method Number
Constructor 1
Exec 2

Market Actor

Codes

// TODO

Methods

Method Name Method Number
Constructor 1
AddBalance 2
WithdrawBalance 3
PublishStorageDeals 4
VerifyDealsForActivation 5
ActivateDeals 6
OnMinerSectorsTerminate 8
CronTick 9

Multisig Actor

Codes

// TODO

Methods

Paych Actor

Codes

// TODO

Methods

Power Actor

Codes

// TODO

Methods

Reward Actor

Codes

// TODO

Methods

System Actor

Codes

// TODO

Methods

Verifreg Actor

Codes

// TODO

Methods

@frrist
Copy link
Member

frrist commented Dec 6, 2022

You could put the details from the above on its own page and link to it from the Message section of the page: https://lilium.sh/data/chain/#messages

If you want to automate printing the actor codes here is some prior art: https://github.com/frrist/print-actor-versions/blob/main/main.go (its very incomplete, but gives a general idea of the packages to import and things to call. Feel free to copy and paste the code wherever you need it.)

Copy link
Contributor

@placer14 placer14 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for reviewing/updating. 🙏

@frrist
Copy link
Member

frrist commented Dec 8, 2022

@vinhloc30796 please don't merge this until conflicts are addressed and a second round of review is had

Copy link
Member

@frrist frrist left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see comment about conflicts

@vinhloc30796
Copy link
Author

@frrist I couldn't find out a good way to get v8 & v9's code from https://github.com/filecoin-project/go-state-types - but made a best attempt so far. Will send in another PR on your other go script

@vinhloc30796 vinhloc30796 marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2023 15:37
@frrist frrist removed their request for review May 23, 2023 18:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants