Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(power): add CurrentTotalPowerReturn serialization tests #1580

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

rvagg
Copy link
Member

@rvagg rvagg commented Sep 27, 2024

Plus a minor naming fix I noticed while looking over #1557. The market actor copy of CurrentTotalPowerReturn is named CurrentTotalPowerReturnParams.

This is on top of #1557, and I'll wait till that's merged before marking this ready for review.

rvagg added a commit to filecoin-project/lotus that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
rvagg added a commit to filecoin-project/lotus that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
@rjan90
Copy link
Contributor

rjan90 commented Oct 1, 2024

Now that #1557 has been merged. Should this be opened for review?

rvagg added a commit to filecoin-project/lotus that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
@rvagg rvagg force-pushed the rvagg/CurrentTotalPowerReturn-ser branch from 3362f51 to db28a77 Compare October 1, 2024 07:06
@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Oct 1, 2024

yep, rebased on master so it's just one commit now, good to go 👍

@rvagg rvagg marked this pull request as ready for review October 1, 2024 07:06
@rvagg rvagg requested a review from ZenGround0 October 1, 2024 07:06
@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Oct 1, 2024

Matches the tests in filecoin-project/go-state-types#314 btw

@rjan90 rjan90 added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 1, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 48eca5e Oct 1, 2024
12 checks passed
@rjan90 rjan90 deleted the rvagg/CurrentTotalPowerReturn-ser branch October 1, 2024 15:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: ☑️ Done (Archive)
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants