Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEAT REQ] Compact mode #686

Closed
ivnnv opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

[FEAT REQ] Compact mode #686

ivnnv opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@ivnnv
Copy link
Contributor

ivnnv commented Feb 15, 2024

Hi, would you consider having a "compact mode" like this?

Heavily inspired on good'old bull-arena Im in the process of replacing by this.

Screenshot 2024-02-15 at 17 57 17

I could be able to implement this myself if you are willing to merge if done right.

Im also planning adding multiple job selector, retry / delete buttons and sorting options, yeah all pretty much the features present on bull-arena still missing here.

Thanks.

@felixmosh
Copy link
Owner

Hi, thank you for the feature request.

What is the motivation for this compact mode?

@ivnnv
Copy link
Contributor Author

ivnnv commented Feb 15, 2024

What is the motivation for this compact mode?

Basically to have a better overview of the jobs awaiting or being injected, it is (in my opinion) easier to see and handle when they are just a list of names than having the whole job expanded because you probably only want to know the full detail of a certain job on request (click and expand).
You can only have like 2 or 3 jobs at quick sight even on large screens at the moment.

Just as a remainder this is how it looks like in bull-arena (ugly, but pretty functional tbh):
Screenshot 2024-02-15 at 17 32 07

@felixmosh
Copy link
Owner

Yeah, it can be done by adding a new setting property.
I'll be happy to review your PR

@ivnnv
Copy link
Contributor Author

ivnnv commented Feb 16, 2024

hey @felixmosh I started working on this, please have a look at this very initial Draft: #687

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants