Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

memory leak in backend->solve() #8

Closed
prudhomm opened this issue Feb 3, 2013 · 0 comments
Closed

memory leak in backend->solve() #8

prudhomm opened this issue Feb 3, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@prudhomm
Copy link
Member

prudhomm commented Feb 3, 2013

Original author: [email protected] (March 12, 2012 16:12:29)

What steps will reproduce the problem?

  1. destroy and re-create the backend at each time iteration

memory grows after each delete/construct

VD: create a testcase to reproduce

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/feelpp/issues/detail?id=8

@prudhomm prudhomm closed this as completed Feb 3, 2013
prudhomm added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2013
check for leaks in PETSc in test_solve_leak
now clear properly solvers before rebuilding a backend, it ensures that not
only the preconditioners but also the petsc solvers (lineat and non-linear)
are destroyed
prudhomm added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2013
…ow clear properly solvers before rebuilding a backend, it ensures that not only the preconditioners but also the petsc solvers (lineat and non-linear) are destroyed
prudhomm added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2013
check for leaks in PETSc in test_solve_leak
now clear properly solvers before rebuilding a backend, it ensures that not
only the preconditioners but also the petsc solvers (lineat and non-linear)
are destroyed
prudhomm added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 13, 2013
…ow clear properly solvers before rebuilding a backend, it ensures that not only the preconditioners but also the petsc solvers (lineat and non-linear) are destroyed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant