Update brand and URL references

[maxgio92]

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug
/kind documentation

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

/area integrations
/area examples

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR updates Sysdig references to Falco ones, from documentation to integrations, like Falco APT and RPM repositories in the Puppet module.

[poiana]

@maxgio92: The label(s) area/integrations, area/examples cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug
/kind documentation

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

/area integrations
/area examples

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR updates Sysdig references to Falco ones, from documentation to integrations, like Falco APT and RPM repositories in the Puppet module.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[leodido]

Left some comments on typos!

Thanks for submitting this Max 🤗

[maxgio92]

Thank you @leodido !
There are still references in /deploy/kubernetes/falco/templates/configmap.yaml, but they come from the default Falco ruleset.
Maybe we can review also them, as I saw that they're referencing for instance docker.io/sysdig/falco image, while the current one comes from docker.io/falcosecurity/falco repository AFAIK. WDYT?

[leodido]

Thank you @leodido !
There are still references in /deploy/kubernetes/falco/templates/configmap.yaml, but they come from the default Falco ruleset.
Maybe we can review also them, as I saw that they're referencing for instance docker.io/sysdig/falco image, while the current one comes from docker.io/falcosecurity/falco repository AFAIK. WDYT?

Oh, yes docker.io/sysdig/falco (and also sysdig/falco) should be removed. Those are 4 years old images we don't publish and no one uses (AFAIK).

I suggest you to do that in a follow-up PR to keep things simple.

Anyways, this topic would definitely need an issue also in the Falco repository! Mind opening it Max? :)

[poiana]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: leodido

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [leodido]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[poiana]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: d4b7cb8a1e12c6b7aa9261090c6e7bd525014815

[maxgio92]

Sure @leodido