chore(deps): update devdependencies #2218

renovate · 2023-06-19T01:44:08Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
@vueuse/core	`~10.1.2` -> `~10.2.0`
cypress	`~12.13.0` -> `~12.14.0`
esbuild	`~0.17.19` -> `~0.18.4`
eslint (source)	`~8.42.0` -> `~8.43.0`
eslint-plugin-jsdoc	`~46.2.4` -> `~46.2.6`
eslint-plugin-vitest	`~0.2.5` -> `~0.2.6`
glob	`~10.2.6` -> `~10.2.7`
semver	`~7.5.1` -> `~7.5.2`

Release Notes

vueuse/vueuse

View changes on GitHub

cypress-io/cypress

`v12.14.0`

Compare Source

Changelog: https://docs.cypress.io/guides/references/changelog#12-14-0

evanw/esbuild

`v0.18.4`

Compare Source

Bundling no longer unnecessarily transforms class syntax (#1360, #1328, #1524, #2416)

When bundling, esbuild automatically converts top-level class statements to class expressions. Previously this conversion had the unfortunate side-effect of also transforming certain other class-related syntax features to avoid correctness issues when the references to the class name within the class body. This conversion has been reworked to avoid doing this:
```
// Original code
export class Foo {
  static foo = () => Foo
}

// Old output (with --bundle)
var _Foo = class {
};
var Foo = _Foo;
__publicField(Foo, "foo", () => _Foo);

// New output (with --bundle)
var Foo = class _Foo {
  static foo = () => _Foo;
};
```
This conversion process is very complicated and has many edge cases (including interactions with static fields, static blocks, private class properties, and TypeScript experimental decorators). It should already be pretty robust but a change like this may introduce new unintentional behavior. Please report any issues with this upgrade on the esbuild bug tracker.

You may be wondering why esbuild needs to do this at all. One reason to do this is that esbuild's bundler sometimes needs to lazily-evaluate a module. For example, a module may end up being both the target of a dynamic import() call and a static import statement. Lazy module evaluation is done by wrapping the top-level module code in a closure. To avoid a performance hit for static import statements, esbuild stores top-level exported symbols outside of the closure and references them directly instead of indirectly.

Another reason to do this is that multiple JavaScript VMs have had and continue to have performance issues with TDZ (i.e. "temporal dead zone") checks. These checks validate that a let, or const, or class symbol isn't used before it's initialized. Here are two issues with well-known VMs:
- V8: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=13723 (10% slowdown)
- JavaScriptCore: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199866 (1,000% slowdown!)
JavaScriptCore had a severe performance issue as their TDZ implementation had time complexity that was quadratic in the number of variables needing TDZ checks in the same scope (with the top-level scope typically being the worst offender). V8 has ongoing issues with TDZ checks being present throughout the code their JIT generates even when they have already been checked earlier in the same function or when the function in question has already been run (so the checks have already happened).

Due to esbuild's parallel architecture, esbuild both a) needs to convert class statements into class expressions during parsing and b) doesn't yet know whether this module will need to be lazily-evaluated or not in the parser. So esbuild always does this conversion during bundling in case it's needed for correctness (and also to avoid potentially catastrophic performance issues due to bundling creating a large scope with many TDZ variables).
Enforce TDZ errors in computed class property keys (#2045)

JavaScript allows class property keys to be generated at run-time using code, like this:
```
class Foo {
  static foo = 'foo'
  static [Foo.foo + '2'] = 2
}
```
Previously esbuild treated references to the containing class name within computed property keys as a reference to the partially-initialized class object. That meant code that attempted to reference properties of the class object (such as the code above) would get back undefined instead of throwing an error.

This release rewrites references to the containing class name within computed property keys into code that always throws an error at run-time, which is how this JavaScript code is supposed to work. Code that does this will now also generate a warning. You should never write code like this, but it now should be more obvious when incorrect code like this is written.

Fix an issue with experimental decorators and static fields (#2629)

This release also fixes a bug regarding TypeScript experimental decorators and static class fields which reference the enclosing class name in their initializer. This affected top-level classes when bundling was enabled. Previously code that does this could crash because the class name wasn't initialized yet. This case should now be handled correctly:

// Original code
class Foo {
  @&#8203;someDecorator
  static foo = 'foo'
  static bar = Foo.foo.length
}

// Old output
const _Foo = class {
  static foo = "foo";
  static bar = _Foo.foo.length;
};
let Foo = _Foo;
__decorateClass([
  someDecorator
], Foo, "foo", 2);

// New output
const _Foo = class _Foo {
  static foo = "foo";
  static bar = _Foo.foo.length;
};
__decorateClass([
  someDecorator
], _Foo, "foo", 2);
let Foo = _Foo;

Fix a minification regression with negative numeric properties (#3169)

Version 0.18.0 introduced a regression where computed properties with negative numbers were incorrectly shortened into a non-computed property when minification was enabled. This regression has been fixed:

// Original code
x = {
  [1]: 1,
  [-1]: -1,
  [NaN]: NaN,
  [Infinity]: Infinity,
  [-Infinity]: -Infinity,
}

// Old output (with --minify)
x={1:1,-1:-1,NaN:NaN,1/0:1/0,-1/0:-1/0};

// New output (with --minify)
x={1:1,[-1]:-1,NaN:NaN,[1/0]:1/0,[-1/0]:-1/0};

`v0.18.3`

Compare Source

Fix a panic due to empty static class blocks (#3161)

This release fixes a bug where an internal invariant that was introduced in the previous release was sometimes violated, which then caused a panic. It happened when bundling code containing an empty static class block with both minification and bundling enabled.

`v0.18.2`

Compare Source

Lower static blocks when static fields are lowered (#2800, #2950, #3025)

This release fixes a bug where esbuild incorrectly did not lower static class blocks when static class fields needed to be lowered. For example, the following code should print 1 2 3 but previously printed 2 1 3 instead due to this bug:

// Original code
class Foo {
  static x = console.log(1)
  static { console.log(2) }
  static y = console.log(3)
}

// Old output (with --supported:class-static-field=false)
class Foo {
  static {
    console.log(2);
  }
}
__publicField(Foo, "x", console.log(1));
__publicField(Foo, "y", console.log(3));

// New output (with --supported:class-static-field=false)
class Foo {
}
__publicField(Foo, "x", console.log(1));
console.log(2);
__publicField(Foo, "y", console.log(3));

Use static blocks to implement --keep-names on classes (#2389)

This change fixes a bug where the name property could previously be incorrect within a class static context when using --keep-names. The problem was that the name property was being initialized after static blocks were run instead of before. This has been fixed by moving the name property initializer into a static block at the top of the class body:
```
// Original code
if (typeof Foo === 'undefined') {
  let Foo = class {
    static test = this.name
  }
  console.log(Foo.test)
}

// Old output (with --keep-names)
if (typeof Foo === "undefined") {
  let Foo2 = /* @&#8203;__PURE__ */ __name(class {
    static test = this.name;
  }, "Foo");
  console.log(Foo2.test);
}

// New output (with --keep-names)
if (typeof Foo === "undefined") {
  let Foo2 = class {
    static {
      __name(this, "Foo");
    }
    static test = this.name;
  };
  console.log(Foo2.test);
}
```
This change was somewhat involved, especially regarding what esbuild considers to be side-effect free. Some unused classes that weren't removed by tree shaking in previous versions of esbuild may now be tree-shaken. One example is classes with static private fields that are transformed by esbuild into code that doesn't use JavaScript's private field syntax. Previously esbuild's tree shaking analysis ran on the class after syntax lowering, but with this release it will run on the class before syntax lowering, meaning it should no longer be confused by class mutations resulting from automatically-generated syntax lowering code.

`v0.18.1`

Compare Source

Fill in null entries in input source maps (#3144)

If esbuild bundles input files with source maps and those source maps contain a sourcesContent array with null entries, esbuild previously copied those null entries over to the output source map. With this release, esbuild will now attempt to fill in those null entries by looking for a file on the file system with the corresponding name from the sources array. This matches esbuild's existing behavior that automatically generates the sourcesContent array from the file system if the entire sourcesContent array is missing.
Support /* @__KEY__ */ comments for mangling property names (#2574)

Property mangling is an advanced feature that enables esbuild to minify certain property names, even though it's not possible to automatically determine that it's safe to do so. The safe property names are configured via regular expression such as --mangle-props=_$ (mangle all properties ending in _).

Sometimes it's desirable to also minify strings containing property names, even though it's not possible to automatically determine which strings are property names. This release makes it possible to do this by annotating those strings with /* @__KEY__ */. This is a convention that Terser added earlier this year, and which esbuild is now following too: https://github.com/terser/terser/pull/1365. Using it looks like this:
```
// Original code
console.log(
  [obj.mangle_, obj.keep],
  [obj.get('mangle_'), obj.get('keep')],
  [obj.get(/* @&#8203;__KEY__ */ 'mangle_'), obj.get(/* @&#8203;__KEY__ */ 'keep')],
)

// Old output (with --mangle-props=_$)
console.log(
  [obj.a, obj.keep],
  [obj.get("mangle_"), obj.get("keep")],
  [obj.get(/* @&#8203;__KEY__ */ "mangle_"), obj.get(/* @&#8203;__KEY__ */ "keep")]
);

// New output (with --mangle-props=_$)
console.log(
  [obj.a, obj.keep],
  [obj.get("mangle_"), obj.get("keep")],
  [obj.get(/* @&#8203;__KEY__ */ "a"), obj.get(/* @&#8203;__KEY__ */ "keep")]
);
```
Support /* @__NO_SIDE_EFFECTS__ */ comments for functions (#3149)

Rollup has recently added support for /* @__NO_SIDE_EFFECTS__ */ annotations before functions to indicate that calls to these functions can be removed if the result is unused (i.e. the calls can be assumed to have no side effects). This release adds basic support for these to esbuild as well, which means esbuild will now parse these comments in input files and preserve them in output files. This should help people that use esbuild in combination with Rollup.

Note that this doesn't necessarily mean esbuild will treat these calls as having no side effects, as esbuild's parallel architecture currently isn't set up to enable this type of cross-file tree-shaking information (tree-shaking decisions regarding a function call are currently local to the file they appear in). If you want esbuild to consider a function call to have no side effects, make sure you continue to annotate the function call with /* @__PURE__ */ (which is the previously-established convention for communicating this).

`v0.18.0`

Compare Source

This release deliberately contains backwards-incompatible changes. To avoid automatically picking up releases like this, you should either be pinning the exact version of esbuild in your package.json file (recommended) or be using a version range syntax that only accepts patch upgrades such as ^0.17.0 or ~0.17.0. See npm's documentation about semver for more information.

The breaking changes in this release mainly focus on fixing some long-standing issues with esbuild's handling of tsconfig.json files. Here are all the changes in this release, in detail:

Add a way to try esbuild online (#797)

There is now a way to try esbuild live on esbuild's website without installing it: https://esbuild.github.io/try/. In addition to being able to more easily evaluate esbuild, this should also make it more efficient to generate esbuild bug reports. For example, you can use it to compare the behavior of different versions of esbuild on the same input. The state of the page is stored in the URL for easy sharing. Many thanks to @hyrious for creating https://hyrious.me/esbuild-repl/, which was the main inspiration for this addition to esbuild's website.

Two forms of build options are supported: either CLI-style (example) or JS-style (example). Both are converted into a JS object that's passed to esbuild's WebAssembly API. The CLI-style argument parser is a custom one that simulates shell quoting rules, and the JS-style argument parser is also custom and parses a superset of JSON (basically JSON5 + regular expressions). So argument parsing is an approximate simulation of what happens for real but hopefully it should be close enough.
Changes to esbuild's tsconfig.json support (#3019):

This release makes the following changes to esbuild's tsconfig.json support:
- Using experimental decorators now requires "experimentalDecorators": true (#104)
  
  Previously esbuild would always compile decorators in TypeScript code using TypeScript's experimental decorator transform. Now that standard JavaScript decorators are close to being finalized, esbuild will now require you to use "experimentalDecorators": true to do this. This new requirement makes it possible for esbuild to introduce a transform for standard JavaScript decorators in TypeScript code in the future. Such a transform has not been implemented yet, however.
- TypeScript's target no longer affects esbuild's target (#2628)
  
  Some people requested that esbuild support TypeScript's target setting, so support for it was added (in version 0.12.4). However, esbuild supports reading from multiple tsconfig.json files within a single build, which opens up the possibility that different files in the build have different language targets configured. There isn't really any reason to do this and it can lead to unexpected results. So with this release, the target setting in tsconfig.json will no longer affect esbuild's own target setting. You will have to use esbuild's own target setting instead (which is a single, global value).
- TypeScript's jsx setting no longer causes esbuild to preserve JSX syntax (#2634)
  
  TypeScript has a setting called jsx that controls how to transform JSX into JS. The tool-agnostic transform is called react, and the React-specific transform is called react-jsx (or react-jsxdev). There is also a setting called preserve which indicates JSX should be passed through untransformed. Previously people would run esbuild with "jsx": "preserve" in their tsconfig.json files and then be surprised when esbuild preserved their JSX. So with this release, esbuild will now ignore "jsx": "preserve" in tsconfig.json files. If you want to preserve JSX syntax with esbuild, you now have to use --jsx=preserve.
  
  Note: Some people have suggested that esbuild's equivalent jsx setting override the one in tsconfig.json. However, some projects need to legitimately have different files within the same build use different transforms (i.e. react vs. react-jsx) and having esbuild's global jsx setting override tsconfig.json would prevent this from working. This release ignores "jsx": "preserve" but still allows other jsx values in tsconfig.json files to override esbuild's global jsx setting to keep the ability for multiple files within the same build to use different transforms.
- useDefineForClassFields behavior has changed (#2584, #2993)
  
  Class fields in TypeScript look like this (x is a class field):
```
class Foo {
  x = 123
}
```
  TypeScript has legacy behavior that uses assignment semantics instead of define semantics for class fields when useDefineForClassFields is enabled (in which case class fields in TypeScript behave differently than they do in JavaScript, which is arguably "wrong").
  
  This legacy behavior exists because TypeScript added class fields to TypeScript before they were added to JavaScript. The TypeScript team decided to go with assignment semantics and shipped their implementation. Much later on TC39 decided to go with define semantics for class fields in JavaScript instead. This behaves differently if the base class has a setter with the same name:
```
class Base {
  set x(_) {
    console.log('x:', _)
  }
}

// useDefineForClassFields: false
class AssignSemantics extends Base {
  constructor() {
    super()
    this.x = 123
  }
}

// useDefineForClassFields: true
class DefineSemantics extends Base {
  constructor() {
    super()
    Object.defineProperty(this, 'x', { value: 123 })
  }
}

console.log(
  new AssignSemantics().x, // Calls the setter
  new DefineSemantics().x // Doesn't call the setter
)
```
  When you run tsc, the value of useDefineForClassFields defaults to false when it's not specified and the target in tsconfig.json is present but earlier than ES2022. This sort of makes sense because the class field language feature was added in ES2022, so before ES2022 class fields didn't exist (and thus TypeScript's legacy behavior is active). However, TypeScript's target setting currently defaults to ES3 which unfortunately means that the useDefineForClassFields setting currently defaults to false (i.e. to "wrong"). In other words if you run tsc with all default settings, class fields will behave incorrectly.
  
  Previously esbuild tried to do what tsc did. That meant esbuild's version of useDefineForClassFields was false by default, and was also false if esbuild's --target= was present but earlier than es2022. However, TypeScript's legacy class field behavior is becoming increasingly irrelevant and people who expect class fields in TypeScript to work like they do in JavaScript are confused when they use esbuild with default settings. It's also confusing that the behavior of class fields would change if you changed the language target (even though that's exactly how TypeScript works).
  
  So with this release, esbuild will now only use the information in tsconfig.json to determine whether useDefineForClassFields is true or not. Specifically useDefineForClassFields will be respected if present, otherwise it will be false if target is present in tsconfig.json and is ES2021 or earlier, otherwise it will be true. Targets passed to esbuild's --target= setting will no longer affect useDefineForClassFields.
  
  Note that this means different directories in your build can have different values for this setting since esbuild allows different directories to have different tsconfig.json files within the same build. This should let you migrate your code one directory at a time without esbuild's --target= setting affecting the semantics of your code.
- Add support for verbatimModuleSyntax from TypeScript 5.0
  
  TypeScript 5.0 added a new option called verbatimModuleSyntax that deprecates and replaces two older options, preserveValueImports and importsNotUsedAsValues. Setting verbatimModuleSyntax to true in tsconfig.json tells esbuild to not drop unused import statements. Specifically esbuild now treats "verbatimModuleSyntax": true as if you had specified both "preserveValueImports": true and "importsNotUsedAsValues": "preserve".
- Add multiple inheritance for tsconfig.json from TypeScript 5.0
  
  TypeScript 5.0 now allows multiple inheritance for tsconfig.json files. You can now pass an array of filenames via the extends parameter and your tsconfig.json will start off containing properties from all of those configuration files, in order. This release of esbuild adds support for this new TypeScript feature.
- Remove support for moduleSuffixes (#2395)
  
  The community has requested that esbuild remove support for TypeScript's moduleSuffixes feature, so it has been removed in this release. Instead you can use esbuild's --resolve-extensions= feature to select which module suffix you want to build with.
- Apply --tsconfig= overrides to stdin and virtual files (#385, #2543)
  
  When you override esbuild's automatic tsconfig.json file detection with --tsconfig= to pass a specific tsconfig.json file, esbuild previously didn't apply these settings to source code passed via the stdin API option or to TypeScript files from plugins that weren't in the file namespace. This release changes esbuild's behavior so that settings from tsconfig.json also apply to these source code files as well.
- Support --tsconfig-raw= in build API calls (#943, #2440)
  
  Previously if you wanted to override esbuild's automatic tsconfig.json file detection, you had to create a new tsconfig.json file and pass the file name to esbuild via the --tsconfig= flag. With this release, you can now optionally use --tsconfig-raw= instead to pass the contents of tsconfig.json to esbuild directly instead of passing the file name. For example, you can now use --tsconfig-raw={"compilerOptions":{"experimentalDecorators":true}} to enable TypeScript experimental decorators directly using a command-line flag (assuming you escape the quotes correctly using your current shell's quoting rules). The --tsconfig-raw= flag previously only worked with transform API calls but with this release, it now works with build API calls too.
- Ignore all tsconfig.json files in node_modules (#276, #2386)
  
  This changes esbuild's behavior that applies tsconfig.json to all files in the subtree of the directory containing tsconfig.json. In version 0.12.7, esbuild started ignoring tsconfig.json files inside node_modules folders. The rationale is that people typically do this by mistake and that doing this intentionally is a rare use case that doesn't need to be supported. However, this change only applied to certain syntax-specific settings (e.g. jsxFactory) but did not apply to path resolution settings (e.g. paths). With this release, esbuild will now ignore all tsconfig.json files in node_modules instead of only ignoring certain settings.
- Ignore tsconfig.json when resolving paths within node_modules (#2481)
  
  Previously fields in tsconfig.json related to path resolution (e.g. paths) were respected for all files in the subtree containing that tsconfig.json file, even within a nested node_modules subdirectory. This meant that a project's paths settings could potentially affect any bundled packages. With this release, esbuild will no longer use tsconfig.json settings during path resolution inside nested node_modules subdirectories.
- Prefer .js over .ts within node_modules (#3019)
  
  The default list of implicit extensions that esbuild will try appending to import paths contains .ts before .js. This makes it possible to bundle TypeScript projects that reference other files in the project using extension-less imports (e.g. ./some-file to load ./some-file.ts instead of ./some-file.js). However, this behavior is undesirable within node_modules directories. Some package authors publish both their original TypeScript code and their compiled JavaScript code side-by-side. In these cases, esbuild should arguably be using the compiled JavaScript files instead of the original TypeScript files because the TypeScript compilation settings for files within the package should be determined by the package author, not the user of esbuild. So with this release, esbuild will now prefer implicit .js extensions over .ts when searching for import paths within node_modules.
These changes are intended to improve esbuild's compatibility with tsc and reduce the number of unfortunate behaviors regarding tsconfig.json and esbuild.
Add a workaround for bugs in Safari 16.2 and earlier (#3072)

Safari's JavaScript parser had a bug (which has now been fixed) where at least something about unary/binary operators nested inside default arguments nested inside either a function or class expression was incorrectly considered a syntax error if that expression was the target of a property assignment. Here are some examples that trigger this Safari bug:
```
❱ x(function (y = -1) {}.z = 2)
SyntaxError: Left hand side of operator '=' must be a reference.

❱ x(class { f(y = -1) {} }.z = 2)
SyntaxError: Left hand side of operator '=' must be a reference.
```
It's not clear what the exact conditions are that trigger this bug. However, a workaround for this bug appears to be to post-process your JavaScript to wrap any in function and class declarations that are the direct target of a property access expression in parentheses. That's the workaround that UglifyJS applies for this issue: mishoo/UglifyJS#2056. So that's what esbuild now does starting with this release:
```
// Original code
x(function (y = -1) {}.z = 2, class { f(y = -1) {} }.z = 2)

// Old output (with --minify --target=safari16.2)
x(function(c=-1){}.z=2,class{f(c=-1){}}.z=2);

// New output (with --minify --target=safari16.2)
x((function(c=-1){}).z=2,(class{f(c=-1){}}).z=2);
```
This fix is not enabled by default. It's only enabled when --target= contains Safari 16.2 or earlier, such as with --target=safari16.2. You can also explicitly enable or disable this specific transform (called function-or-class-property-access) with --supported:function-or-class-property-access=false.

Fix esbuild's TypeScript type declarations to forbid unknown properties (#3089)

Version 0.17.0 of esbuild introduced a specific form of function overloads in the TypeScript type definitions for esbuild's API calls that looks like this:

interface TransformOptions {
  legalComments?: 'none' | 'inline' | 'eof' | 'external'
}

interface TransformResult<ProvidedOptions extends TransformOptions = TransformOptions> {
  legalComments: string | (ProvidedOptions['legalComments'] extends 'external' ? never : undefined)
}

declare function transformSync<ProvidedOptions extends TransformOptions>(input: string, options?: ProvidedOptions): TransformResult<ProvidedOptions>
declare function transformSync(input: string, options?: TransformOptions): TransformResult

This more accurately reflects how esbuild's JavaScript API behaves. The result object returned by transformSync only has the legalComments property if you pass legalComments: 'external':

// These have type "string | undefined"
transformSync('').legalComments
transformSync('', { legalComments: 'eof' }).legalComments

// This has type "string"
transformSync('', { legalComments: 'external' }).legalComments

However, this form of function overloads unfortunately allows typos (e.g. egalComments) to pass the type checker without generating an error as TypeScript allows all objects with unknown properties to extend TransformOptions. These typos result in esbuild's API throwing an error at run-time.

To prevent typos during type checking, esbuild's TypeScript type definitions will now use a different form that looks like this:

type SameShape<Out, In extends Out> = In & { [Key in Exclude<keyof In, keyof Out>]: never }

interface TransformOptions {
  legalComments?: 'none' | 'inline' | 'eof' | 'external'
}

interface TransformResult<ProvidedOptions extends TransformOptions = TransformOptions> {
  legalComments: string | (ProvidedOptions['legalComments'] extends 'external' ? never : undefined)
}

declare function transformSync<T extends TransformOptions>(input: string, options?: SameShape<TransformOptions, T>): TransformResult<T>

This change should hopefully not affect correct code. It should hopefully introduce type errors only for incorrect code.

Fix CSS nesting transform for pseudo-elements (#3119)

This release fixes esbuild's CSS nesting transform for pseudo-elements (e.g. ::before and ::after). The CSS nesting specification says that the nesting selector does not work with pseudo-elements. This can be seen in the example below: esbuild does not carry the parent pseudo-element ::before through the nesting selector &. However, that doesn't apply to pseudo-elements that are within the same selector. Previously esbuild had a bug where it considered pseudo-elements in both locations as invalid. This release changes esbuild to only consider those from the parent selector invalid, which should align with the specification:
```
/* Original code */
a, b::before {
  &.c, &::after {
    content: 'd';
  }
}

/* Old output (with --target=chrome90) */
a:is(.c, ::after) {
  content: "d";
}

/* New output (with --target=chrome90) */
a.c,
a::after {
  content: "d";
}
```

Forbid & before a type selector in nested CSS

The people behind the work-in-progress CSS nesting specification have very recently decided to forbid nested CSS that looks like &div. You will have to use either div& or &:is(div) instead. This release of esbuild has been updated to take this new change into consideration. Doing this now generates a warning. The suggested fix is slightly different depending on where in the overall selector it happened:

▲ [WARNING] Cannot use type selector "input" directly after nesting selector "&" [css-syntax-error]

    example.css:2:3:
      2 │   &input {
        │    ~~~~~
        ╵    :is(input)

  CSS nesting syntax does not allow the "&" selector to come before a type selector. You can wrap
  this selector in ":is()" as a workaround. This restriction exists to avoid problems with SASS
  nesting, where the same syntax means something very different that has no equivalent in real CSS
  (appending a suffix to the parent selector).

▲ [WARNING] Cannot use type selector "input" directly after nesting selector "&" [css-syntax-error]

    example.css:6:8:
      6 │   .form &input {
        │         ~~~~~~
        ╵         input&

  CSS nesting syntax does not allow the "&" selector to come before a type selector. You can move
  the "&" to the end of this selector as a workaround. This restriction exists to avoid problems
  with SASS nesting, where the same syntax means something very different that has no equivalent in
  real CSS (appending a suffix to the parent selector).

eslint/eslint

`v8.43.0`

Compare Source

Features

14581ff feat: directive prologue detection and autofix condition in quotes (#17284) (Francesco Trotta)
e50fac3 feat: add declaration loc to message in block-scoped-var (#17252) (Milos Djermanovic)
1b7faf0 feat: add skipJSXText option to no-irregular-whitespace rule (#17182) (Azat S)

Bug Fixes

5338b56 fix: normalize cwd passed to ESLint/FlatESLint constructor (#17277) (Milos Djermanovic)
54383e6 fix: Remove no-extra-parens autofix for potential directives (#17022) (Francesco Trotta)

Documentation

8b855ea docs: resubmit pr17061 doc changes (#17292) (唯然)
372722e docs: resubmit pr17012 doc changes (#17293) (唯然)
67e7af3 docs: resubmit custom-rules doc changes (#17294) (唯然)
9e3d77c docs: Resubmit Fix formatting in Custom Rules docs (#17281) (Milos Djermanovic)
503647a docs: Resubmit markVariableAsUsed docs (#17280) (Nicholas C. Zakas)
e0cf0d8 docs: Custom rule & plugin tutorial (#17024) (Ben Perlmutter)
8e51ea9 docs: resubmit no-new rule documentation (#17264) (Nitin Kumar)
1b217f8 docs: resubmit Custom Processors documentation (#17265) (Nitin Kumar)
428fc76 docs: resubmit Create Plugins documentation (#17268) (Nitin Kumar)
bdca88c docs: resubmit Configuration Files documentation (#17267) (Nitin Kumar)
f5c01f2 docs: resubmit Manage Issues documentation (#17266) (Nitin Kumar)
b199295 docs: Resubmit custom rules update docs (#17273) (Ben Perlmutter)
0e9980c docs: add new omitLastInOneLineClassBody option to the semi rule (#17263) (Nitin Kumar)
cb2560f docs: Resubmit getScope/getDeclaredVariables docs (#17262) (Nicholas C. Zakas)
85d2b30 docs: explain how to include predefined globals (#17261) (Marcus Wyatt)
de4d3c1 docs: update flat config default ignore patterns (#17258) (Milos Djermanovic)
3912f3a docs: Improve ignores documentation (#17239) (Francesco Trotta)
35e11d3 docs: fix typos and missing info (#17257) (Ed Lucas)
0bc257c docs: Clarify no-div-regex rule docs (#17051) (#17255) (Francesco Trotta)
788d836 docs: add references to MIT License (#17248) (Milos Djermanovic)
58aab6b docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
3ef5814 docs: Revert all changes after the license change (#17227) (Milos Djermanovic)
03fc4aa docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)

Chores

78350f6 chore: upgrade @eslint/js @8.43.0 (#17295) (Milos Djermanovic)
62bf759 chore: package.json update for @eslint/js release (ESLint Jenkins)
e0a2448 chore: docs package.license ISC => MIT (#17254) (唯然)
6a0196c chore: use eslint-plugin-eslint-plugin flat configs (#17204) (Milos Djermanovic)

gajus/eslint-plugin-jsdoc

`v46.2.6`

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

imports-as-dependencies: do not log missing package.json when rule is not active; fixes #1117 (3a5dd7d)

`v46.2.5`

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

imports-as-dependencies: support Node builtins; fixes #1112 (ab00592)

veritem/eslint-plugin-vitest

`v0.2.6`

Compare Source

isaacs/node-glob

`v10.2.7`

Compare Source

npm/node-semver

`v7.5.2`

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

58c791f #566 diff when detecting major change from prerelease (#566) (@lukekarrys)
5c8efbc #565 preserve build in raw after inc (#565) (@lukekarrys)
717534e #564 better handling of whitespace (#564) (@lukekarrys)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

codecov · 2023-06-19T01:56:40Z

Codecov Report

Merging #2218 (8f2a2d5) into next (633ddba) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             next    #2218      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.60%   99.59%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        2631     2631              
  Lines      245567   245567              
  Branches     1158     1152       -6     
==========================================
- Hits       244596   244579      -17     
- Misses        944      961      +17     
  Partials       27       27

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner June 19, 2023 01:44

renovate bot added the c: dependencies Pull requests that adds/updates a dependency label Jun 19, 2023

ejcheng added this to the v8 - None milestone specific tasks milestone Jun 19, 2023

renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/devdependencies branch from 277ec71 to b2a4ed8 Compare June 19, 2023 06:52

chore(deps): update devdependencies

8f2a2d5

renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/devdependencies branch from b2a4ed8 to 8f2a2d5 Compare June 19, 2023 07:28

ST-DDT approved these changes Jun 19, 2023

View reviewed changes

ST-DDT enabled auto-merge (squash) June 19, 2023 10:22

ST-DDT requested review from a team June 19, 2023 10:22

xDivisionByZerox approved these changes Jun 19, 2023

View reviewed changes

ST-DDT merged commit 0356146 into next Jun 19, 2023

renovate bot deleted the renovate/devdependencies branch June 19, 2023 11:40

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

chore(deps): update devdependencies #2218

chore(deps): update devdependencies #2218

renovate bot commented Jun 19, 2023

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading

chore(deps): update devdependencies #2218

chore(deps): update devdependencies #2218

Conversation

renovate bot commented Jun 19, 2023

Release Notes

🚀 Features

🐞 Bug Fixes

🏎 Performance

Features

Bug Fixes

Documentation

Chores

Bug Fixes

Bug Fixes

Bug Fixes

Configuration

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2023 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading