Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow more types of dictionary keys in overrides grammar #1208
Allow more types of dictionary keys in overrides grammar #1208
Changes from 2 commits
68fb1db
1478301
ee5eaa8
a99c690
0b53209
6bcaac2
e249eb5
fc87464
8084317
cfe3932
4af259e
2e545f9
0d74504
0c894b3
8a16f54
4f2665e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test, and test_overrides_dict_keys - are very high level.
you have some low level tests in test_overrides_parser and you are jumping straight into testing as processes.
If I understand the purpose of those tests correctly (and it's hard because they are so high level), I think should should be replaced by lower level config composition test in test_config_loader.py.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, to clarify the motivation: those two new tests are meant to test the changes in
types.py
(which are not tested by the low level grammar tests)The second one (
test_overrides_dict_keys
) should probably indeed be a lower level test. I wasn't familiar with the various Hydra tests and couldn't figure out where the basic override functionalities were being tested. I just moved it totest_config_loader.py
as you suggested: see 6bcaac2, let me know if that makes more sense this way. The main thing that needs to be tested is quoted strings as keys, but I thought it wouldn't hurt to add tests for all other kinds of string formatting that we may expect, just in case (also later on, we should also test other types of keys like int / float / bool if we support them).I'm not sure I can move
test_multirun_dict_keys
to this same file though. This test specifically tests the change to_get_value_element_as_str()
(l. 429 of types.py in the current diff of this PR), which is used in sweeps to provide the proper command line overrides. Again, the main thing that needs testing are quoted strings, but I added the other key formats as well to be safe.Maybe to clarify the purpose of this test, I can show you how it fails if I revert the l.429 change:
(this is because the sweeper would not replace the
QuotedString
with its actual quoted string representation in the command line override)Side note: I also pushed 0b53209 which removes some comments that seemed irrelevant to me (probably a copy/paste leftover from another comment you can see below them)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great.
There is a test in test_overrides_parser that is dedicated for that logic:
test_override_get_value_element_method
I think testing there should be sufficient.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perfect! Done in 8084317
At the same time I uncovered a bug with escaped characters (that affected regular unquoted strings as well, not just dictionary keys), which is now fixed in that same commit.