Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unused www scheduler fork #13545

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2018
Merged

Remove unused www scheduler fork #13545

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2018

Conversation

gaearon
Copy link
Collaborator

@gaearon gaearon commented Sep 3, 2018

This fork was already being ignored on master because Scheduler is now a dependency of ReactDOM, and thus isn't being bundled with it. And in those cases our forking mechanism doesn't kick in.

It was also wrong because the exports in it don't match how those functions are named in www.

I'm deleting it. During the sync we'll need to rename our internal customSchedule to just schedule fork in our www node_modules shims, and then tweak it to match the unstable_ API names. We'll also need to tweak existing customSchedule callsites.

@gaearon gaearon changed the title Remove www scheduler fork Remove unused www scheduler fork Sep 3, 2018
@gaearon gaearon merged commit c1ba7b8 into facebook:master Sep 3, 2018
@bvaughn
Copy link
Contributor

bvaughn commented Sep 3, 2018

👍

@pull-bot
Copy link

pull-bot commented Sep 3, 2018

Details of bundled changes.

Comparing: b473d5f...ea45942

schedule

File Filesize Diff Gzip Diff Prev Size Current Size Prev Gzip Current Gzip ENV
schedule.development.js n/a n/a 0 B 19.17 KB 0 B 5.74 KB UMD_DEV
schedule.production.min.js n/a n/a 0 B 3.16 KB 0 B 1.53 KB UMD_PROD

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS

jetoneza pushed a commit to jetoneza/react that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2019
Remove unused www scheduler fork
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants