This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 24, 2018. It is now read-only.
Fix for [JENKINS-50664] container cap limit hit due to default label #6
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue : Setting container cap limit configuration doesn't work correctly without Jenkins restart. The root cause of the issue is label management for slave pods. Once user set the container cap limit configuration for given namespace. Plugin fails to account slave pods/containers based using pods labels. It accounts all pods/containers from the namespace which are not started by the Kubernetes plugin.
This patch fixes this issue using default slave labels "jenkins"->"slave"
fixes: openshiftio/openshift.io#2729