Enum.ConvertFromModel should use Basetype.ConvertFromModel method #2224

jarifibrahim · 2018-08-08T06:42:31Z

The ConvertFromModel method on Enum Type should use ConvertFromModel method of the base type instead of ConvertToModel

alien-ike · 2018-08-08T06:42:31Z

Ike Plugins (test-keeper)

Thank you @jarifibrahim for this contribution!

It seems that this PR already contains some added or changed tests. Good job!

For more information please head over to official documentation. You can find there how to configure the plugin.

codecov-io · 2018-08-08T07:03:02Z

Codecov Report

Merging #2224 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 87.5%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2224      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.09%   70.09%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         174      174              
  Lines       16792    16796       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        11771    11773       +2     
- Misses       3888     3889       +1     
- Partials     1133     1134       +1

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
workitem/simple_type.go	`82.89% <ø> (ø)`	⬆️
workitem/workitem_repository.go	`67.79% <100%> (-0.23%)`	⬇️
workitem/enum_type.go	`86.25% <83.33%> (+0.72%)`	⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8795c9f...f47eed7. Read the comment docs.

kwk

LGTM. Good catch

baijum

We need tests for this functions.

kwk · 2018-08-08T09:31:49Z

@jarifibrahim It seems we still haven't solved the issue with duplicate container names:

The container name "/jenkins-devtools-fabric8-wit-coverage-3528" is already in use by container 6ec16b9e27efa414525193d897ae2315e662bd23e5a00e17b01dbeb6df9b4e73. You have to remove (or rename) that container to be able to reuse that name..

See https://ci.centos.org/job/devtools-fabric8-wit/3537/console

kwk · 2018-08-08T09:32:55Z

We need tests for this functions.

There are tests but currently they don't respect input, model and storage domains well enough. It will come and look like this soon:

fabric8-wit/workitem/field_test_data.go

Line 60 in 0b33f55

func GetFieldTypeTestData(t *testing.T) FieldTypeTestDataMap {

kwk · 2018-08-08T09:54:12Z

[test]

kwk

@jarifibrahim please add just a test to proof your change is working. @baijum has a point.

jarifibrahim · 2018-08-08T11:11:19Z

[test]

…c8-wit into enum-type-fix

jarifibrahim · 2018-09-24T10:14:27Z

@kwk I've added some tests in 414395f . Please take a look at it.

jarifibrahim · 2018-09-24T10:15:20Z

workitem/enum_type_blackbox_test.go

+		data []testCase
+	}{
+		{
+			"kind string",


We would need similar test data for ConvertToModel method but I am not sure how we could separate data from the test.

That will be part of first cleaning up the typesystem. The test data needs to know no only input and output but also how a value is stored inside:

JSON -> Go -> DB -> Go -JSON

jarifibrahim · 2018-09-25T11:06:50Z

[test]

jarifibrahim · 2018-09-25T12:49:54Z

workitem/workitem_repository.go

@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ func (r *GormWorkItemRepository) Save(ctx context.Context, spaceID uuid.UUID, up
 		}
 		fieldValue := updatedWorkItem.Fields[fieldName]
 		var err error
-		if fieldName == SystemAssignees || fieldName == SystemLabels || fieldName == SystemBoardcolumns {
+		if fieldDef.Type.GetKind() == KindList {


This change wasn't necessary for this PR but since this was a minor change I did it in this PR.

jarifibrahim · 2018-09-25T12:50:19Z

workitem/workitem_repository.go

@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ func (r *GormWorkItemRepository) Create(ctx context.Context, spaceID uuid.UUID,
 		if err != nil {
 			return nil, nil, errors.NewBadParameterError(fieldName, fieldValue) // TODO(kwk): Change errors pkg to consume the original error as well
 		}
-		if (fieldName == SystemAssignees || fieldName == SystemLabels || fieldName == SystemBoardcolumns) && fieldValue == nil {
+		if fieldDef.Type.GetKind() == KindList && fieldValue == nil {


Same as https://github.com/fabric8-services/fabric8-wit/pull/2224/files#r220177847

jarifibrahim · 2018-09-25T12:52:07Z

workitem/enum_type_blackbox_test.go

+		expectedOutput interface{}
+		wantErr        bool
+	}
+	tests := []struct {


The enum type created for the test uses only string, int and float as the base type. I have not added area/iteration/user for base type because it would not add much value.

It would add much value but currently the type-system treats all of them as strings which is simple wrong. But this is subject of another PR.

jarifibrahim · 2018-09-25T12:52:51Z

workitem/enum_type_blackbox_test.go

+			},
+			[]testCase{
+				{"ok", 4, 4, false},
+				{"ok - nil", nil, nil, false},


This is important. The method does not return error on nil value.

jarifibrahim · 2018-10-01T08:44:06Z

@kwk I've updated the PR. Can you please review it again?

kwk · 2018-10-01T10:41:17Z

workitem/enum_type.go

 	if err != nil {
 		return nil, fmt.Errorf("error converting enum value: %s", err.Error())
 	}
+	if !contains(t.Values, converted) {
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("value: %+v (%[1]T) is not part of allowed enum values: %+v", value, t.Values)


@jarifibrahim please return a traceable errs.Errorf error instead.

@kwk I've changed it in 5512f13

But could you please explain why should we use errs.Errorf instead of fmt.Errorf? Is it because errs.Errorf has a stacktrace?

kwk · 2018-10-01T10:42:31Z

workitem/enum_type_blackbox_test.go

+		expectedOutput interface{}
+		wantErr        bool
+	}
+	tests := []struct {


It would add much value but currently the type-system treats all of them as strings which is simple wrong. But this is subject of another PR.

kwk · 2018-10-01T10:44:37Z

workitem/enum_type_blackbox_test.go

+		data []testCase
+	}{
+		{
+			"kind string",


You're using an enum of type string, why did you call this test "kind string" then? I suggest to have more tests for list, enums and simple types and test every one of them individually.

This is a test for enum of type string. I can rename Kind String to type string. Would that be enough?

Never mind. I didn't see the context for this subtest.

kwk · 2018-10-01T10:45:06Z

workitem/enum_type_blackbox_test.go

+			},
+		},
+		{
+			"kind int",


Same here, why do you use an enum of ints and call the tests "kind int"?

Same as #2224 (comment)

kwk · 2018-10-01T10:45:23Z

workitem/enum_type_blackbox_test.go

+			},
+		},
+		{
+			"kind float",


Same here...

Same as #2224 (comment)

…c8-wit into enum-type-fix

kwk

LGTM

@pbergene

# About This description was generated using this script: ```sh #!/bin/bash set -e GHORG=${GHORG:-fabric8-services} GHREPO=${GHREPO:-fabric8-wit} cat <<EOF # About This description was generated using this script: \`\`\`sh `cat $0` \`\`\` Invoked as: `echo GHORG=${GHORG} GHREPO=${GHREPO} $(basename $0) ${@:1}` # Changes EOF git log \ --pretty="%n**Commit:** https://github.com/${GHORG}/${GHREPO}/commit/%H%n**Author:** %an (%ae)%n**Date:** %aI%n%n%s%n%n%b%n%n----%n" \ --reverse ${@:1} \ | sed -E "s/([\s|\(| ])#([0-9]+)/\1${GHORG}\/${GHREPO}#\2/g" ``` Invoked as: GHORG=fabric8-services GHREPO=fabric8-wit git-log-pr.sh 164762f67a3a7634fa4ee1e8bb55c458281803c7..1371e8243fb9f68775a50a8eca738193db706164 # Changes **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@7ab24ac **Author:** Tina Kurian ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-10T09:47:29-04:00 area iteration root path should not be empty (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2214) See fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2203 Co-authored-by: Konrad Kleine [email protected] ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@c2816aa **Author:** Ibrahim Jarif ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-10T21:47:14+05:30 Update gopkg.lock file (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2282) The `gopkg.lock` file is out of date. This PR updated it. How to verify this PR 1. Run `dep ensure` on current master. You should see the `gopkg.lock` is modified. 2. Check the changes in `gopkg.lock` file against the ones in this PR. They should be same. 3. Run `dep ensure` again and you would notice `gopkg.lock` has not changed. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@426e11b **Author:** Elliott Baron ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-10T16:29:27-04:00 Add authorization checking to Kubernetes package (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2207) * Initial implementation of OpenShift authz checking * Remove unused interactions in delete cassettes * Add CanDeploy to filter deployable environments, maintain full list in kubeClient * Implement authz check for DeleteDeployment * Implement remaining methods, add tests for access control failure on builds * Fix URLProvider changes, add tests for CanDeploy * Better test error conditions * Clean up code * Add more internal environments to kubeclient tests * Improve documentation, avoid boolean parameter for getting namespace * Also check for wildcard rules * Reduce size of go-vcr cassettes ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@a8fab53 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-11T08:37:08+02:00 testfixture.GetTestFileAndFunc() (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2149) `GetTestFileAndFunc` returns the file and function of the first `_test.go` file to appear in the stack and returns it in this schema: ``` (see function github.com/fabric8-services/fabric8-wit/test/testfixture_test.TestGetGetTestFileAndFunc in test/testfixture/testfixture_test.go) ``` The result can be used to augment entities so that we always can tell which test created an entity that is a left-over and not cleaned up for example. NOTE: The `testfixutre.GetTestFileAndFunc()` was taken out of this PR and already merge with this PR fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2214. It is no longer part of this PR. Most of the entities created with the `test/testfixture` package now contain a description that reveals in which function the entities was created. When there are left-over entities that hinder tests from running properly, you can now go in the database and find out which test produced these left-overs. To simplify things when running on CI, we now output a list of remaining spaces automatically that looks like this if everything went ok: ``` Check that no unexpected left-over spaces exist after running tests: -[ RECORD 1 ]------------------------------------- id | 2e0698d8-753e-4cef-bb7c-f027634824a2 name | system.space description | Description of the space ``` Note, that the `system.space` is okay to appear in this list. It is expected even though it should go away at some point. See fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2278 for an example of a PR that was easily fixed because of this PR. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@ba71ed1 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-11T12:14:39+02:00 Allow searching for work items with a single quote in the search string (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2272) A query parameter `q` as in `https://prod-preview.openshift.io/api/search?q='problem` was not properly escaped before it was passed to the PostgreSQL `to_tsquery` function. We now remove the single quote from the input to `to_tsquery`. On the frontend this API was called when search for work items in the "Links" section. Addresses fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2273 and openshiftio/openshift.io#4288 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@d6a192d **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-11T12:50:30+02:00 Don't run tests involving the DB in parallel (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2276) Possibly related to openshiftio/openshift.io#4299 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@f276f3a **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-17T14:30:48+02:00 Don't have a zero-parent relationship for root iteration/area (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2283) Before a root iteration/area had a parent iteration with a zeroed UUID: ```yaml "relationships": { "parent": { "data": { "id": "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000", "type": "iterations" }, ``` That is removed now. This adds a test that shows how a root and a child iteration/area are represented on JSONAPI level. Added `testfixture.SetAreaNames()` and `testfixture.AreaByName()` functions as well. This fixes the root cause for openshiftio/openshift.io#4309 . The UI fix in Raunak1203/fabric8-planner@e7c34a2 only fixes a symptom by implementing a work around. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@59561d0 **Author:** Ibrahim Jarif ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-17T18:38:35+05:30 Better error logging for Delete action on /space endpoint (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2280) ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@a917dfe **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-20T23:24:41+02:00 Introduce number column for area and iteration and allow searching it (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2287) This change refactors how a human readable number is assigned to work items. The refactored code makes it easy to have iterations and areas also have a human readable number. See https://openshift.io/openshiftio/Openshift_io/plan/detail/618 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@71bed56 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-21T08:48:55+02:00 Empty commit to trigger build (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2290) ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@fce4430 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-21T09:38:26+02:00 Double the amount of allowed time for a pod to be ready (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2292) See fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2291 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@66831f3 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-21T18:05:23+02:00 Improve perf of calculating WIs in iteration (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2294) We're seriously wasting time in calculating numbers of work items in iterations by ignoring the fact that we're in a space. @pbergene gave me a dump of slow queries this morning and while I was looking for something completely else I noticed this piece: ``` "Query Text": "SELECT iterations.id as IterationId, count(*) as Total,\ \ \ \ count( case fields->>'system.state' when 'closed' then '1' else null end ) as Closed FROM \\"work_items\\" left join iterations\ \ \ \ on fields@> concat('{\\"system.iteration\\": \\"', iterations.id, '\\"}')::jsonb WHERE (iterations.space_id = $1\ \ \ \ and work_items.deleted_at IS NULL) GROUP BY IterationId", ``` This query is so slow (~55 to 60ms) that and it appears so often that the log of slow queries is cluttered with this. This change is supposed to address this by limiting the number of work items that are queried to the current space. Also the counting is simplified by using PostgreSQLs `FILTER` expression (see https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/sql-expressions.html). We have switched from a `LEFT JOIN` to an `INNER JOIN` for because we can discard work items in the search result if they don't have an iteration assigned (thanks to @jarifibrahim for measuring this here: fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2294 (comment)). No functionality should have been changed which is why all the test should continue to work as expected. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@7fd5f0b **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-21T18:40:20+02:00 Remove the duration field kind (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2289) We don't have any usage for the duration field kind. No space template uses this field type so far. The duration causes us far more problems than it does good. Especially in making the type system rock-solid, the duration has always caused problems. This is because we tried to store a duration as an `int64` which it really is (see https://godoc.org/time#Duration). The problem with this is that the underlying fields are stored in a JSONB structure. And JSON only supports `float64`. When we assigned an `int64` to `float64` the duration was rounded to the nearest `float64` and this is not accurate. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@fce0b6a **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-21T19:12:51+02:00 Double the amount of allowed time for a pod to be ready (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2295) from 60 seconds to now 120 seconds See fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2291 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@07f931d **Author:** Ibrahim Jarif ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-25T18:38:25+05:30 Improve DeleteSpace error messages (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2297) Minor improvements to errors returned from the Detele action on space controller. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@cd7a01b **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-25T15:38:13+02:00 10x the amount of allowed time for a pod to be ready (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2298) from 120 seconds to now 1200 seconds See fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2291 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@2a95482 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-26T09:38:38+02:00 Use existing number sequences instead of looking them up again (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2299) In order to avoid a sequential table scan on the `work_items` DB table we take the already calculated values for the new `number_sequences` table from the old `work_item_number_sequences`. Before this was the query plan for `INSERT` into the new `number_sequences` table: ``` EXPLAIN SELECT space_id, 'work_items' "table_name", MAX(number) FROM work_items WHERE number IS NOT NULL GROUP BY 1,2; +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | QUERY PLAN | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | GroupAggregate (cost=37097.49..38835.71 rows=37629 width=52) | | Group Key: space_id, 'work_items'::text | | -> Sort (cost=37097.49..37437.97 rows=136193 width=52) | | Sort Key: space_id | | -> Seq Scan on work_items (cost=0.00..20824.93 rows=136193 width=52) | | Filter: (number IS NOT NULL) | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ``` and now it is: ``` EXPLAIN SELECT space_id, 'work_items' "table_name", current_val FROM work_item_number_sequences GROUP BY 1,2; +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | QUERY PLAN | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Group (cost=0.29..3541.66 rows=43872 width=52) | | Group Key: space_id, 'work_items'::text | | -> Index Scan using work_item_number_sequences_pkey on work_item_number_sequences (cost=0.29..3322.30 rows=43872 width=52) | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ``` Thanks go out to @jarifibrahim for bringing my attention to this sequential table scan. See fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2291 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@cdef2ae **Author:** Elliott Baron ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-26T14:43:12-04:00 Add deployments API to compute quota necessary for scale-up (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2286) This PR adds a new API serviced by the deployments controller at /deployments/spaces/{spaceID}/applications/{appName}/deployments/{deployName}/podlimits. Calling this API on a particular deployment determines the CPU and memory resources required in order to add a new pod to the deployment. This will allow the front-end to decide whether to stop the user from attempting to scale up a deployment if they do not have sufficient quota to do so successfully. Example usage: Request: GET https://openshift.io/api/deployments/spaces/$SPACE/applications/$APP/deployments/run/podlimits Response: {"data":{"limits":{"cpucores":1,"memory":262144000}}} This work was initially done by @chrislessard, and I have added tests and some modifications. Fixes: openshiftio/openshift.io#3388 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@8ea84f1 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-28T10:29:51+02:00 Remove work item link category concept (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2301) For over two years we haven't used the link category concept and it is not adding any value except for a theoretical one that can be realized differently directly by modifying a link type; hence I remove this concept. This involves removal of - category relationship in the link type's design (package: `design`) - category endpoints (packages: `design` and `controller`) - repository for categories (package: `workitem/link`) - removal of foreign key constraint on the `link_category_id` column of the `work_item_link_types` table **NOTE:** the `work_item_link_categories` table or the `link_category_id` column on the `work_item_link_types` table will **NOT** be removed in the change. This is subject of a followup change. The reason is that we want old and new pods to run on the same database. (Thank you to @xcoulon for reminding me of that). Also a lot of golden files were updated because the sequential part of UUIDs affected a shift in the UUID numbering. This will fix openshiftio/openshift.io#4299 the hard way :) ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@e483be8 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-28T12:18:06+02:00 acquire exclusive lock on spaces, areas, iterations and work_item_number_sequences table to avoid deadlock during migration (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2303) In order to avoid the following deadlock situation, the 106 migration now acquires an exclusive lock on the `spaces`, `iterations`, `areas` and `work_item_number_sequences` tables. Legend: - relation `36029` = `spaces` - relation `36042` = `iterations` ``` Process 875 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on relation 36029 of database 13322; blocked by process 5634. Process 5634 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 36042 of database 13322; blocked by process 875. ``` ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@b80e543 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-01T12:39:11+02:00 Have convert.EqualValue and convert.CascadeEqual (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2285) ## About We need a way to compare if the object stored in the database is the same as the one we have loaded from a space template. In the template we don't care about when an object is created. That's why we need a method that is agnostic to the `gormsupport.Lifecycle` and a `Version` field. In this change I've extended the `convert.Equaler` interface with a function called `EqualValue` that has the same signature as `Equal`. When implementing `EqualValue` one should focus only on values that make up the object to compare. For example, if an object has a `Version` and a `gormsupport.Lifecycle` member, those are good candidates to be ignored inside of `EqualValue`. If an object has nested members that themselves implement the `convert.Equaler` interface, we want to call either `Equal` or `EqualValue` on them. It depends on what the outer, containing object is compared with. The `convert.CascadeEqual` takes care of that. ## Minor additional edits Some implementation of `Equal` tested for the wrong object because they didn't isolate the data properly using subtests. I've fixed that. Also, some implementations of `Equal` didn't test for `Version` or `Lifecycle` differences. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@54f03e1 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-01T13:19:30+02:00 empty commit to trigger build (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2308) ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@8e81220 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-01T14:47:15+02:00 Revert "Introduce number column for area and iteration and allow seahching it (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2287)" (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2307) This reverts commit a917dfe49bfeaf5715f9822138b1599e94af00b9 (aka fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2287). We're experiencing trouble to migrate the DB for this change (see https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/dtsd/housekeeping/issues/2349). Currently the prod-preview database is not being updated and stalls at the migration from 105 to 106 (number for iteration an area). ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@af5e62d **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-01T17:10:20+02:00 Add number_sequences table and nullable 'number' column on areas and iterations tables (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2309) This adds back the `number_sequences` table the `number` columns on the `areas` and `iterations` tables (known from fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2287 but then reverted). But it does this in three individual steps. This change is backwards compatible with the old code as the `number` column is nullable. Except for this structural change, no data is changed. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@c824993 **Author:** Elliott Baron ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-01T16:43:57-04:00 Add API to show resource usage for the current space (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2306) This PR adds a deployments-related API under /deployments/environments/spaces/:spaceID. This endpoint returns resource usage for each of the user's environments, divided into usage by the specified space and usage by all other spaces combined. Currently this only returns CPU and memory usage, and not objects such as pods or secrets. There is an older /deployments/spaces/:spaceID/environments endpoint which has been left for backwards compatibility until the front-end is switched over completely. Example usage: Request: GET https://openshift.io/api/deployments/environments/spaces/$SPACE_ID Response: { "data": [ { "attributes": { "name": "run", "other_usage": { "cpucores": { "quota": 2, "used": 0.488 }, "memory": { "quota": 1073741824, "used": 262144000 }, "persistent_volume_claims": { "quota": 1, "used": 0 }, "replication_controllers": { "quota": 20, "used": 6 }, "secrets": { "quota": 20, "used": 9 }, "services": { "quota": 5, "used": 3 } }, "space_usage": { "cpucores": 1.488, "memory": 799014912 } }, "id": "run", "type": "environment" } ] } This work was started by @chrislessard, which I have put the finishing touches on and opened the PR on his behalf. Fixes: openshiftio/openshift.io#3129 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@e75e0d1 **Author:** Baiju Muthukadan ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-03T17:25:48+05:30 Query language support for child iteration & area (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2182) Query language support to fetch work items that belong to an iteration and its child iterations. Similarly, areas can be used. Example:- ``` {"iteration": "name", "child": true} ``` The default is true. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@8795c9f **Author:** Ibrahim Jarif ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-08T19:16:45+05:30 Add more logs for Delete action on space controller (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2310) This PR adds more logs to the delete action on space controller. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@a661437 **Author:** Ibrahim Jarif ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-09T12:48:37+05:30 Enum.ConvertFromModel should use Basetype.ConvertFromModel method (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2224) The `ConvertFromModel` method on `Enum Type` now uses `ConvertFromModel` method of the `base type` instead of `ConvertToModel`. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@1371e82 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-09T16:24:11+02:00 drop constraint before modifying the path (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2312) Based on [this discussion](https://chat.openshift.io/developers/pl/6m4cojtiotdoueqot8uww5ybpe) we first remove the unique name index on the `iterations` and `areas` table before we modify the data. This should fix the migration issue that was visible here: #1082 ----

@pbergene

# Changes **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@7ab24ac **Author:** Tina Kurian ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-10T09:47:29-04:00 area iteration root path should not be empty (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2214) See fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2203 Co-authored-by: Konrad Kleine [email protected] ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@c2816aa **Author:** Ibrahim Jarif ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-10T21:47:14+05:30 Update gopkg.lock file (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2282) The `gopkg.lock` file is out of date. This PR updated it. How to verify this PR 1. Run `dep ensure` on current master. You should see the `gopkg.lock` is modified. 2. Check the changes in `gopkg.lock` file against the ones in this PR. They should be same. 3. Run `dep ensure` again and you would notice `gopkg.lock` has not changed. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@426e11b **Author:** Elliott Baron ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-10T16:29:27-04:00 Add authorization checking to Kubernetes package (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2207) * Initial implementation of OpenShift authz checking * Remove unused interactions in delete cassettes * Add CanDeploy to filter deployable environments, maintain full list in kubeClient * Implement authz check for DeleteDeployment * Implement remaining methods, add tests for access control failure on builds * Fix URLProvider changes, add tests for CanDeploy * Better test error conditions * Clean up code * Add more internal environments to kubeclient tests * Improve documentation, avoid boolean parameter for getting namespace * Also check for wildcard rules * Reduce size of go-vcr cassettes ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@a8fab53 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-11T08:37:08+02:00 testfixture.GetTestFileAndFunc() (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2149) `GetTestFileAndFunc` returns the file and function of the first `_test.go` file to appear in the stack and returns it in this schema: ``` (see function github.com/fabric8-services/fabric8-wit/test/testfixture_test.TestGetGetTestFileAndFunc in test/testfixture/testfixture_test.go) ``` The result can be used to augment entities so that we always can tell which test created an entity that is a left-over and not cleaned up for example. NOTE: The `testfixutre.GetTestFileAndFunc()` was taken out of this PR and already merge with this PR fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2214. It is no longer part of this PR. Most of the entities created with the `test/testfixture` package now contain a description that reveals in which function the entities was created. When there are left-over entities that hinder tests from running properly, you can now go in the database and find out which test produced these left-overs. To simplify things when running on CI, we now output a list of remaining spaces automatically that looks like this if everything went ok: ``` Check that no unexpected left-over spaces exist after running tests: -[ RECORD 1 ]------------------------------------- id | 2e0698d8-753e-4cef-bb7c-f027634824a2 name | system.space description | Description of the space ``` Note, that the `system.space` is okay to appear in this list. It is expected even though it should go away at some point. See fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2278 for an example of a PR that was easily fixed because of this PR. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@ba71ed1 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-11T12:14:39+02:00 Allow searching for work items with a single quote in the search string (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2272) A query parameter `q` as in `https://prod-preview.openshift.io/api/search?q='problem` was not properly escaped before it was passed to the PostgreSQL `to_tsquery` function. We now remove the single quote from the input to `to_tsquery`. On the frontend this API was called when search for work items in the "Links" section. Addresses fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2273 and openshiftio/openshift.io#4288 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@d6a192d **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-11T12:50:30+02:00 Don't run tests involving the DB in parallel (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2276) Possibly related to openshiftio/openshift.io#4299 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@f276f3a **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-17T14:30:48+02:00 Don't have a zero-parent relationship for root iteration/area (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2283) Before a root iteration/area had a parent iteration with a zeroed UUID: ```yaml "relationships": { "parent": { "data": { "id": "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000", "type": "iterations" }, ``` That is removed now. This adds a test that shows how a root and a child iteration/area are represented on JSONAPI level. Added `testfixture.SetAreaNames()` and `testfixture.AreaByName()` functions as well. This fixes the root cause for openshiftio/openshift.io#4309 . The UI fix in Raunak1203/fabric8-planner@e7c34a2 only fixes a symptom by implementing a work around. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@59561d0 **Author:** Ibrahim Jarif ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-17T18:38:35+05:30 Better error logging for Delete action on /space endpoint (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2280) ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@a917dfe **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-20T23:24:41+02:00 Introduce number column for area and iteration and allow searching it (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2287) This change refactors how a human readable number is assigned to work items. The refactored code makes it easy to have iterations and areas also have a human readable number. See https://openshift.io/openshiftio/Openshift_io/plan/detail/618 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@71bed56 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-21T08:48:55+02:00 Empty commit to trigger build (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2290) ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@fce4430 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-21T09:38:26+02:00 Double the amount of allowed time for a pod to be ready (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2292) See fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2291 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@66831f3 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-21T18:05:23+02:00 Improve perf of calculating WIs in iteration (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2294) We're seriously wasting time in calculating numbers of work items in iterations by ignoring the fact that we're in a space. @pbergene gave me a dump of slow queries this morning and while I was looking for something completely else I noticed this piece: ``` "Query Text": "SELECT iterations.id as IterationId, count(*) as Total,\ \ \ \ count( case fields->>'system.state' when 'closed' then '1' else null end ) as Closed FROM \\"work_items\\" left join iterations\ \ \ \ on fields@> concat('{\\"system.iteration\\": \\"', iterations.id, '\\"}')::jsonb WHERE (iterations.space_id = $1\ \ \ \ and work_items.deleted_at IS NULL) GROUP BY IterationId", ``` This query is so slow (~55 to 60ms) that and it appears so often that the log of slow queries is cluttered with this. This change is supposed to address this by limiting the number of work items that are queried to the current space. Also the counting is simplified by using PostgreSQLs `FILTER` expression (see https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/sql-expressions.html). We have switched from a `LEFT JOIN` to an `INNER JOIN` for because we can discard work items in the search result if they don't have an iteration assigned (thanks to @jarifibrahim for measuring this here: fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2294 (comment)). No functionality should have been changed which is why all the test should continue to work as expected. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@7fd5f0b **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-21T18:40:20+02:00 Remove the duration field kind (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2289) We don't have any usage for the duration field kind. No space template uses this field type so far. The duration causes us far more problems than it does good. Especially in making the type system rock-solid, the duration has always caused problems. This is because we tried to store a duration as an `int64` which it really is (see https://godoc.org/time#Duration). The problem with this is that the underlying fields are stored in a JSONB structure. And JSON only supports `float64`. When we assigned an `int64` to `float64` the duration was rounded to the nearest `float64` and this is not accurate. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@fce0b6a **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-21T19:12:51+02:00 Double the amount of allowed time for a pod to be ready (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2295) from 60 seconds to now 120 seconds See fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2291 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@07f931d **Author:** Ibrahim Jarif ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-25T18:38:25+05:30 Improve DeleteSpace error messages (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2297) Minor improvements to errors returned from the Detele action on space controller. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@cd7a01b **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-25T15:38:13+02:00 10x the amount of allowed time for a pod to be ready (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2298) from 120 seconds to now 1200 seconds See fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2291 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@2a95482 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-26T09:38:38+02:00 Use existing number sequences instead of looking them up again (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2299) In order to avoid a sequential table scan on the `work_items` DB table we take the already calculated values for the new `number_sequences` table from the old `work_item_number_sequences`. Before this was the query plan for `INSERT` into the new `number_sequences` table: ``` EXPLAIN SELECT space_id, 'work_items' "table_name", MAX(number) FROM work_items WHERE number IS NOT NULL GROUP BY 1,2; +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | QUERY PLAN | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | GroupAggregate (cost=37097.49..38835.71 rows=37629 width=52) | | Group Key: space_id, 'work_items'::text | | -> Sort (cost=37097.49..37437.97 rows=136193 width=52) | | Sort Key: space_id | | -> Seq Scan on work_items (cost=0.00..20824.93 rows=136193 width=52) | | Filter: (number IS NOT NULL) | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ``` and now it is: ``` EXPLAIN SELECT space_id, 'work_items' "table_name", current_val FROM work_item_number_sequences GROUP BY 1,2; +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | QUERY PLAN | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Group (cost=0.29..3541.66 rows=43872 width=52) | | Group Key: space_id, 'work_items'::text | | -> Index Scan using work_item_number_sequences_pkey on work_item_number_sequences (cost=0.29..3322.30 rows=43872 width=52) | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ``` Thanks go out to @jarifibrahim for bringing my attention to this sequential table scan. See fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2291 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@cdef2ae **Author:** Elliott Baron ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-26T14:43:12-04:00 Add deployments API to compute quota necessary for scale-up (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2286) This PR adds a new API serviced by the deployments controller at /deployments/spaces/{spaceID}/applications/{appName}/deployments/{deployName}/podlimits. Calling this API on a particular deployment determines the CPU and memory resources required in order to add a new pod to the deployment. This will allow the front-end to decide whether to stop the user from attempting to scale up a deployment if they do not have sufficient quota to do so successfully. Example usage: Request: GET https://openshift.io/api/deployments/spaces/$SPACE/applications/$APP/deployments/run/podlimits Response: {"data":{"limits":{"cpucores":1,"memory":262144000}}} This work was initially done by @chrislessard, and I have added tests and some modifications. Fixes: openshiftio/openshift.io#3388 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@8ea84f1 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-28T10:29:51+02:00 Remove work item link category concept (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2301) For over two years we haven't used the link category concept and it is not adding any value except for a theoretical one that can be realized differently directly by modifying a link type; hence I remove this concept. This involves removal of - category relationship in the link type's design (package: `design`) - category endpoints (packages: `design` and `controller`) - repository for categories (package: `workitem/link`) - removal of foreign key constraint on the `link_category_id` column of the `work_item_link_types` table **NOTE:** the `work_item_link_categories` table or the `link_category_id` column on the `work_item_link_types` table will **NOT** be removed in the change. This is subject of a followup change. The reason is that we want old and new pods to run on the same database. (Thank you to @xcoulon for reminding me of that). Also a lot of golden files were updated because the sequential part of UUIDs affected a shift in the UUID numbering. This will fix openshiftio/openshift.io#4299 the hard way :) ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@e483be8 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-09-28T12:18:06+02:00 acquire exclusive lock on spaces, areas, iterations and work_item_number_sequences table to avoid deadlock during migration (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2303) In order to avoid the following deadlock situation, the 106 migration now acquires an exclusive lock on the `spaces`, `iterations`, `areas` and `work_item_number_sequences` tables. Legend: - relation `36029` = `spaces` - relation `36042` = `iterations` ``` Process 875 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on relation 36029 of database 13322; blocked by process 5634. Process 5634 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 36042 of database 13322; blocked by process 875. ``` ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@b80e543 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-01T12:39:11+02:00 Have convert.EqualValue and convert.CascadeEqual (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2285) ## About We need a way to compare if the object stored in the database is the same as the one we have loaded from a space template. In the template we don't care about when an object is created. That's why we need a method that is agnostic to the `gormsupport.Lifecycle` and a `Version` field. In this change I've extended the `convert.Equaler` interface with a function called `EqualValue` that has the same signature as `Equal`. When implementing `EqualValue` one should focus only on values that make up the object to compare. For example, if an object has a `Version` and a `gormsupport.Lifecycle` member, those are good candidates to be ignored inside of `EqualValue`. If an object has nested members that themselves implement the `convert.Equaler` interface, we want to call either `Equal` or `EqualValue` on them. It depends on what the outer, containing object is compared with. The `convert.CascadeEqual` takes care of that. ## Minor additional edits Some implementation of `Equal` tested for the wrong object because they didn't isolate the data properly using subtests. I've fixed that. Also, some implementations of `Equal` didn't test for `Version` or `Lifecycle` differences. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@54f03e1 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-01T13:19:30+02:00 empty commit to trigger build (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2308) ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@8e81220 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-01T14:47:15+02:00 Revert "Introduce number column for area and iteration and allow seahching it (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2287)" (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2307) This reverts commit a917dfe49bfeaf5715f9822138b1599e94af00b9 (aka fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2287). We're experiencing trouble to migrate the DB for this change (see https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/dtsd/housekeeping/issues/2349). Currently the prod-preview database is not being updated and stalls at the migration from 105 to 106 (number for iteration an area). ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@af5e62d **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-01T17:10:20+02:00 Add number_sequences table and nullable 'number' column on areas and iterations tables (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2309) This adds back the `number_sequences` table the `number` columns on the `areas` and `iterations` tables (known from fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2287 but then reverted). But it does this in three individual steps. This change is backwards compatible with the old code as the `number` column is nullable. Except for this structural change, no data is changed. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@c824993 **Author:** Elliott Baron ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-01T16:43:57-04:00 Add API to show resource usage for the current space (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2306) This PR adds a deployments-related API under /deployments/environments/spaces/:spaceID. This endpoint returns resource usage for each of the user's environments, divided into usage by the specified space and usage by all other spaces combined. Currently this only returns CPU and memory usage, and not objects such as pods or secrets. There is an older /deployments/spaces/:spaceID/environments endpoint which has been left for backwards compatibility until the front-end is switched over completely. Example usage: Request: GET https://openshift.io/api/deployments/environments/spaces/$SPACE_ID Response: { "data": [ { "attributes": { "name": "run", "other_usage": { "cpucores": { "quota": 2, "used": 0.488 }, "memory": { "quota": 1073741824, "used": 262144000 }, "persistent_volume_claims": { "quota": 1, "used": 0 }, "replication_controllers": { "quota": 20, "used": 6 }, "secrets": { "quota": 20, "used": 9 }, "services": { "quota": 5, "used": 3 } }, "space_usage": { "cpucores": 1.488, "memory": 799014912 } }, "id": "run", "type": "environment" } ] } This work was started by @chrislessard, which I have put the finishing touches on and opened the PR on his behalf. Fixes: openshiftio/openshift.io#3129 ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@e75e0d1 **Author:** Baiju Muthukadan ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-03T17:25:48+05:30 Query language support for child iteration & area (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2182) Query language support to fetch work items that belong to an iteration and its child iterations. Similarly, areas can be used. Example:- ``` {"iteration": "name", "child": true} ``` The default is true. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@8795c9f **Author:** Ibrahim Jarif ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-08T19:16:45+05:30 Add more logs for Delete action on space controller (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2310) This PR adds more logs to the delete action on space controller. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@a661437 **Author:** Ibrahim Jarif ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-09T12:48:37+05:30 Enum.ConvertFromModel should use Basetype.ConvertFromModel method (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2224) The `ConvertFromModel` method on `Enum Type` now uses `ConvertFromModel` method of the `base type` instead of `ConvertToModel`. ---- **Commit:** fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@1371e82 **Author:** Konrad Kleine ([email protected]) **Date:** 2018-10-09T16:24:11+02:00 drop constraint before modifying the path (fabric8-services/fabric8-wit#2312) Based on [this discussion](https://chat.openshift.io/developers/pl/6m4cojtiotdoueqot8uww5ybpe) we first remove the unique name index on the `iterations` and `areas` table before we modify the data. This should fix the migration issue that was visible here: #1082 ----

Enum.ConvertFromModel should use Basetype.ConvertFromModel method

733fd02

jarifibrahim self-assigned this Aug 8, 2018

jarifibrahim requested review from baijum and kwk August 8, 2018 07:08

kwk approved these changes Aug 8, 2018

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'master' into enum-type-fix

3699075

baijum approved these changes Aug 8, 2018

View reviewed changes

kwk suggested changes Aug 8, 2018

View reviewed changes

jarifibrahim added 4 commits September 24, 2018 10:01

Merge branch 'master' into enum-type-fix

da8831c

fixup ConvertFromModel function

92170e5

Add test for enumType.ConvertFromModel

414395f

Merge branch 'enum-type-fix' of https://github.com/jarifibrahim/fabri…

5d2b6b4

…c8-wit into enum-type-fix

jarifibrahim commented Sep 24, 2018

View reviewed changes

jarifibrahim added 2 commits September 24, 2018 16:40

fix failing tests

89e7036

fixup

e5965f9

jarifibrahim force-pushed the enum-type-fix branch from bd194a9 to e5965f9 Compare September 25, 2018 05:29

Minor changes

ec7ace0

jarifibrahim commented Sep 25, 2018

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'master' into enum-type-fix

427afb0

kwk suggested changes Oct 1, 2018

View reviewed changes

jarifibrahim added 2 commits October 8, 2018 17:24

Use errs.Errorf instead of fmt.Errorf

5512f13

Merge branch 'enum-type-fix' of https://github.com/jarifibrahim/fabri…

377c80e

…c8-wit into enum-type-fix

jarifibrahim force-pushed the enum-type-fix branch from f9be137 to 377c80e Compare October 8, 2018 13:20

jarifibrahim added 2 commits October 8, 2018 19:13

Merge branch 'master' into enum-type-fix

575bc70

Merge branch 'master' into enum-type-fix

f47eed7

kwk approved these changes Oct 9, 2018

View reviewed changes

kwk merged commit a661437 into fabric8-services:master Oct 9, 2018

kwk mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2018

push fabric8-services/fabric8-wit@a661437 to prod openshiftio/saas-openshiftio#1065

Merged

jarifibrahim deleted the enum-type-fix branch October 9, 2018 08:50

kwk mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2018

Update core.yaml openshiftio/saas-openshiftio#1083

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Enum.ConvertFromModel should use Basetype.ConvertFromModel method #2224

Enum.ConvertFromModel should use Basetype.ConvertFromModel method #2224

jarifibrahim commented Aug 8, 2018

alien-ike commented Aug 8, 2018 •

edited

Loading

codecov-io commented Aug 8, 2018 •

edited by codecov bot

Loading

kwk left a comment

baijum left a comment

kwk commented Aug 8, 2018

kwk commented Aug 8, 2018

kwk commented Aug 8, 2018

kwk left a comment

jarifibrahim commented Aug 8, 2018

jarifibrahim commented Sep 24, 2018

jarifibrahim Sep 24, 2018

kwk Sep 24, 2018

jarifibrahim commented Sep 25, 2018

jarifibrahim Sep 25, 2018

jarifibrahim Sep 25, 2018

jarifibrahim Sep 25, 2018

kwk Oct 1, 2018

jarifibrahim Sep 25, 2018

jarifibrahim commented Oct 1, 2018

kwk Oct 1, 2018

jarifibrahim Oct 8, 2018

kwk Oct 1, 2018

kwk Oct 1, 2018

jarifibrahim Oct 8, 2018

kwk Oct 8, 2018

kwk Oct 1, 2018

jarifibrahim Oct 8, 2018

kwk Oct 1, 2018

jarifibrahim Oct 8, 2018

kwk left a comment

Enum.ConvertFromModel should use Basetype.ConvertFromModel method #2224

Enum.ConvertFromModel should use Basetype.ConvertFromModel method #2224

Conversation

jarifibrahim commented Aug 8, 2018

alien-ike commented Aug 8, 2018 • edited Loading

Ike Plugins (test-keeper)

codecov-io commented Aug 8, 2018 • edited by codecov bot Loading

Codecov Report

kwk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

baijum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

kwk commented Aug 8, 2018

kwk commented Aug 8, 2018

kwk commented Aug 8, 2018

kwk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

jarifibrahim commented Aug 8, 2018

jarifibrahim commented Sep 24, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

jarifibrahim commented Sep 25, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

jarifibrahim commented Oct 1, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

kwk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

alien-ike commented Aug 8, 2018 •

edited

Loading

codecov-io commented Aug 8, 2018 •

edited by codecov bot

Loading