Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EZEE-1710: Change Selenium version #59

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2017
Merged

EZEE-1710: Change Selenium version #59

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2017

Conversation

mnocon
Copy link
Member

@mnocon mnocon commented Aug 30, 2017

JIRA: EZEE-1710

Description

This PR introduces the same changes as in ezsystems/ezplatform#203 to make sure our tests on Jenkins behave the same way as on Travis.

I've set shm_size to 256m, because my local tests showed that 128m is too low (I guess interacting with the Studio editor requires more resources). 256m should be enough.

@mnocon mnocon changed the title [WIP] EZEE-1710: Change Selenium version EZEE-1710: Change Selenium version Aug 31, 2017
@mnocon
Copy link
Member Author

mnocon commented Aug 31, 2017

@vidarl @andrerom If I got everything right this PR should introduce the same changes to ezrobot that were done in ezsystems/ezplatform#203

@@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ selenium:
- SCREEN_WIDTH=1920
- SCREEN_HEIGHT=1080
- SCREEN_DEPTH=24
# Because of: https://github.com/elgalu/docker-selenium/issues/20
shm_size: 256m
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indenting is wrong (one space too much)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, fixed

@vidarl
Copy link
Member

vidarl commented Aug 31, 2017

@micszo : Pinging you just in case as we have had quite a few issues with selenium/firefox in the past...

Looks fine to me.. Unless there are objections I purpose to merge after weekend ( Monday ). I should be able to dig into ezrobot if it by any chance causes problems

@mnocon
Copy link
Member Author

mnocon commented Aug 31, 2017

I'm fine with merging it on Monday, there's no rush.

@micszo
Copy link
Member

micszo commented Aug 31, 2017

@vidarl thanks. For me it's ok to take it easy.

@mnocon
Copy link
Member Author

mnocon commented Sep 4, 2017

@vidarl, @micszo do we give it a try? I guess the build won't be green (there might be changes to some tests needed, I'll handle it) but in general it should work.

@vidarl vidarl merged commit ed39259 into ezsystems:master Sep 4, 2017
@vidarl
Copy link
Member

vidarl commented Sep 4, 2017

merged, ezrobot should automatic pull the changes before running the next job

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants