-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
res.clearCookie() now ignores maxAge #4852
Conversation
Testing the changes, in the unit-test:
confirms the
Great, cookies are not set in the raw http response! Due to my little experience in our test suite, another PR would be useful. But to my understanding things are looking good. |
var app = express(); | ||
|
||
app.use(function(req, res){ | ||
res.clearCookie('sid', { path: '/admin', maxAge: 900 }).end(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// ... blah blah blah
[Symbol(kOutHeaders)]: [Object: null prototype] {
'x-powered-by': [ 'X-Powered-By', 'Express' ],
'set-cookie': [
'Set-Cookie',
'sid=; Path=/admin; Expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT'
]
}
}
.get('/') | ||
.expect('Set-Cookie', 'sid=; Path=/admin; Expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT') | ||
.expect(200, done) | ||
}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Takes the shape:
// ... blah blah blah
_maxListeners: undefined,
_enableHttp2: false,
_agent: false,
_formData: null,
method: 'GET',
url: 'http://127.0.0.1:46159/',
_header: {},
header: {},
writable: true,
_redirects: 0,
_maxRedirects: 0,
cookies: '',
// ... blah blah blah
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good -- I was able to verify the expected raw http outputs
eb10dba
to
340be0f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Excellent!
var opts = merge({ expires: new Date(1), path: '/' }, options); | ||
delete opts.maxAge; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
var opts = merge({ expires: new Date(1), path: '/' }, options); | |
delete opts.maxAge; | |
var opts = merge({ path: '/' }, options); | |
// Force cookie expiration by setting `expires` to a past date | |
opts.expires = new Date(1); | |
// Set maxAge for modern browsers to immediately delete the cookie regardless of system time | |
opts.maxAge = 0 |
Let's do this, to also ensure they cannot overwrite expires
via the options object either
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hold off on this until we get clarity on #4851 (comment) however
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can't land this in v4, so will need to target the v5 dev branch
I don't want to consider this breaking in v4, but ultimately because even an empty cookie can have semantic meaning, it isI think it's debateable whether or not this is truly breaking in v4. I understand it is a change in implementation, but I think the implementation was bugged from the start. You can define breaking as anything needing consumers to update their code. If folks had come to rely on the behavior here, for removing the value of a cookie and then resetting the Unfortunately, even a cookie without a value can have semantic meaning in some applications. So ughhh I guess this is breaking. I think it's a bug in v4, but it would indeed be a breaking change if someone went screwball and used this behavior on purpose in their application. Hmmmm. I guess we can deprecate this behavior in v4 and then remove it in v5 for SURE. |
We've been landing v5 changes to 5.x, which is the only branch we can really land this on currently. So we'll need to change the target or open a new PR We can deprecate the behavior in v4 though as well before we land this |
closing in favor of #5792 |
This pr fixes #4851.
I have ...