Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pop-count: rename to eliuds-eggs #201

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 15, 2024

Conversation

ErikSchierboom
Copy link
Member

We are renaming the pop-count exercise to eliuds-eggs. See exercism/problem-specifications#2382 for more information.


This PR renames pop-count to eliuds-eggs. We have attempted to rename everything that is automatable, but you may need to make specific changes in the files.

If you could prioritise finishing and merging this, we would be grateful, so we can get the exercise in the correct state across Exercism. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks! 🙂

@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom added the x:size/tiny Tiny amount of work label Feb 2, 2024
@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom force-pushed the rename-pop-count-to-eliuds-eggs branch from ff1228a to 6fd9b5e Compare February 2, 2024 13:24
@sudhackar
Copy link
Contributor

sudhackar commented Feb 3, 2024

You'll need to change the names of the test files too - just the directory won't work.

https://github.com/exercism/x86-64-assembly/actions/runs/7756599975/job/21154216409?pr=201#step:5:112

I can raise a new PR since I can't push to branches on this repo

@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom force-pushed the rename-pop-count-to-eliuds-eggs branch from a0b71c9 to 059c232 Compare February 15, 2024 13:30
@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom merged commit 3d19995 into main Feb 15, 2024
4 checks passed
@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom deleted the rename-pop-count-to-eliuds-eggs branch February 15, 2024 13:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
x:size/tiny Tiny amount of work
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants