Add support for 8th

[glennj]

Responding to https://discord.com/channels/854117591135027261/1169215168484479006/1169222372566511676

[glennj]

@ErikSchierboom CI not launching for PRs?

[ErikSchierboom]

That's weird. I'll look into it!

[ErikSchierboom]

Found it. They should be enabled now. Could you add an empty commit or something to test?

[glennj]

"8th" broke it, starting with a digit

[glennj]

Lots of checks getting cancelled, lots failing.
Do we really need to run on so many architectures? Surely the Exercism infrastructure is only using one specific build.

[ErikSchierboom]

Do we really need to run on so many architectures? Surely the Exercism infrastructure is only using one specific build.

We don't. I'll update tomorrow. It's just that I want to make as few changes as possible to the original code, for easy of updating this fork from its source. I might disable these workflows and then add a new one that's specific to this repo.

[ErikSchierboom]

See #5 (review)

[ErikSchierboom]

@glennj CI is failing

[glennj]

@ErikSchierboom and now CI not running?

[ErikSchierboom]

@glennj I had merged master into this branch, but it looked like those commits were gone in this branch.

[glennj]

Phew, that was a journey!

[ErikSchierboom]

You won though! Let me try this :)

[ErikSchierboom]

We're re-counting the existing 8th submissions' lines of code right now.

[ErikSchierboom]

Processing done. For fun, I did a quick count. The following hash shows num_loc => num_submissions

{1=>134,
2=>78,
3=>252,
4=>30,
5=>36,
6=>24,
7=>20,
8=>16,
9=>13,
10=>19,
11=>13,
12=>25,
13=>16,
14=>7,
15=>13,
16=>6,
17=>8,
18=>14,
19=>10,
21=>10,
22=>2,
23=>10,
24=>2,
25=>6,
26=>2,
27=>4,
28=>4,
29=>2,
30=>5,
31=>7,
32=>5,
33=>1,
34=>3,
35=>2,
36=>2,
37=>2,
38=>5,
41=>2,
42=>2,
43=>1,
45=>1,
46=>2,
49=>1,
50=>4,
52=>2,
53=>1,
54=>1,
55=>2,
57=>1,
62=>1,
63=>4,
69=>3,
83=>1,
92=>2,
94=>3}