Fix prerequisites of concept exercises #484
Conversation
Some concept exercises (like magician-in-training) depend on the "conditionals" concept, but this concept does not exist. This causes the concept exercises to remain locked even if someone completed all the conditionals-related exercises.
|
Also, using separate concepts for |
The `strings` concept does not exist, it's called `characters` instead.
sanderploegsma
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also, using separate concepts for if/guard/switch conditionals seems like overkill to me. In my opinion one single "conditionals" concept, where some exercises dive deeper into either if, guard or switch conditionals would be a cleaner way to do it, from a learner's perspective.
Yep, this is totally fine. Feel free to change this in a follow-up PR.
|
Any chance this can be merged? That allows me to continue on my Swift track 🙃 |
|
No problem, thanks for merging! 👍 |
This fixes some prerequisites of concept exercises that point to concepts that do not exist (yet). Specifically, the following non-existing concepts were prerequisites for other exercises:
strings(should probably becharactersinstead)conditionals(covered byconditionals-if,conditionals-guardandconditionals-switch)Because of these incorrect prerequisites some exercises remain locked without a way to unlock them.
Note: An alternative fix for
conditionalscould be to add theconditionalsconcept to the appropriate exercises instead of changing the prerequisites of the others.