-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 519
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
hello world tests via updated x-common data #550
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should the example implementation be updated to remove the Hello, Foo
functionality?
Not sure if any of these are really that important, just things that I noticed 😄.
class HelloWorldTest < Minitest::Test | ||
def test_no_name | ||
def test_Say_Hi! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this maybe be downcased to test_say_hi
?
2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does the version need to be bumped since the old implementation is still valid?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I believe so.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clarification on why I believe it needs to be incremented is that old version would take an argument, this new version will not accept an argument.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like the version increment.
2c3a6c3
to
72f5d93
Compare
nb: Generator still uses git commit sha for version, perhaps should use canonical data version instead. @Insti @tommyschaefer ? |
Generator should be using the sha1 from the canonical data repository already. |
Now I've caught up a bit more I see you mean the version property that is now present in the canonical-data.json files. I'll need to think about the implications of this. Will continue the discussion in: #485 |
Description
Uses the x-common data to simplify the hello world introductory exercise and tests.
Motivation and Context
re: exercism/problem-specifications#520