Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

two-bucket: Add additional tests #763

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 22, 2017
Merged

two-bucket: Add additional tests #763

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 22, 2017

Conversation

behrtam
Copy link
Contributor

@behrtam behrtam commented Apr 21, 2017

Adds one test where goal == start_bucket (one step)
and a second test where start_bucket != goal_bucket.

behrtam added 2 commits April 21, 2017 15:17
Adds one test where `goal == start bucket` (one step)
and a second test where `start_bucket != goal_bucket`.
@behrtam behrtam merged commit 531486a into master Apr 22, 2017
@petertseng petertseng deleted the two-bucket-add-tests branch April 23, 2017 03:12
emcoding pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2018
petertseng added a commit to exercism/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2018
)

Note that two-bucket was added to the Rust track at
#375
At the time it declared 1.0.0 compliance, but was actually compliant
with 1.2.0 already!

Further updates to 1.3.0 and 1.4.0 require no action on the Rust track's
part.

1.0.1: Fix exercise name
exercism/problem-specifications#715

Unversioned(!): Change descriptions
exercism/problem-specifications#716
(Our descriptions are no better or worse, so might as well keep them)

1.1.0: Add cases where goal equals one bucket's capacity
exercism/problem-specifications#763
Rust already had these cases, so just update the descriptions

1.2.0: Fix a test case added in 1.1.0
exercism/problem-specifications#911
exercism/problem-specifications#941
Rust already had the correct values, so no action.

1.3.0: move inputs to `input` object
exercism/problem-specifications#1084

1.4.0: rename JSON keys to camelCase
exercism/problem-specifications#1136
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants