Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change: Added a positive case without 1 unit coin available #620

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2017

Conversation

weapp
Copy link
Contributor

@weapp weapp commented Mar 2, 2017

All the current positive test cases include 1 unit coin in available coins and it's could be confusing.

This commit proposes a new test case that is positive but not includes 1 unit coin in the input.

@rpottsoh rpottsoh changed the title Added a positive case without 1 unit coin available change: Added a positive case without 1 unit coin available Mar 2, 2017
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@
"expected": [2, 2, 5, 20, 20, 50, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100]
},
{
"description": "posible change without one coins available",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@weapp just a small grammatical nit pick, coins should be singular instead of plural. I like the added twist of not having a penny available. Thanks

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"coins of value one"?

"unit coins"?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"posible" -> "possible"

All the current positive test cases include 1 unit coin in available coins and it's could be confusing.

This commit proposes a new test case that is positive but not includes 1 unit coin in the input.
@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom merged commit 68152be into exercism:master Mar 3, 2017
@ErikSchierboom
Copy link
Member

Thanks a lot @weapp! 🎉

emcoding pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants