Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sum-of-multiples: ensure correct sum if one multiple is a factor of another #50

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2014

Conversation

etrepum
Copy link
Contributor

@etrepum etrepum commented Oct 25, 2014

No description provided.

etrepum added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2014
sum-of-multiples: ensure correct sum if one multiple is a factor of another
@etrepum etrepum merged commit b80b254 into master Oct 25, 2014
@kytrinyx kytrinyx deleted the sum-of-multiples-common-factors branch October 25, 2014 17:16
petertseng added a commit to exercism/problem-specifications that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2018
sum-of-multiples 1.4.1

As stated in our guidelines, we want descriptions that tell us why each
case is being tested:
https://github.com/exercism/problem-specifications#test-data-format-canonical-datajson

The canonical data was added in
#206 during a
time when descriptions were not required.

Then, placeholder descriptions were added in
aaa47ee and it was acknowledged at the
time that these descriptions were purely for *schema* compliance, and
not compliance with the guidelines nor a motivation for each case.

By examining the issues that led to each case being added, it is
possible to understand the descriptions.

With more cases being added to sum-of-multiples with clear descriptions,
it's time to bring the other descriptions up to speed as well.

Original exercise:
exercism/exercism@607be68

Additional cases:
exercism/exercism#2486
exercism/exercism#2341
exercism/haskell#50
exercism/go#53
#896
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant