-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 654
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update lasagna_test.go #2779
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update lasagna_test.go #2779
Conversation
Fix a typo
Hello. Thanks for opening a PR on Exercism 🙂 We ask that all changes to Exercism are discussed on our Community Forum before being opened on GitHub. To enforce this, we automatically close all PRs that are submitted. That doesn't mean your PR is rejected but that we want the initial discussion about it to happen on our forum where a wide range of key contributors across the Exercism ecosystem can weigh in. You can use this link to copy this into a new topic on the forum. If we decide the PR is appropriate, we'll reopen it and continue with it, so please don't delete your local branch. If you're interested in learning more about this auto-responder, please read this blog post. Note: If this PR has been pre-approved, please link back to this PR on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it. |
This PR touches files which potentially affect the outcome of the tests of an exercise. This will cause all students' solutions to affected exercises to be re-tested. If this PR does not affect the result of the test (or, for example, adds an edge case that is not worth rerunning all tests for), please add the following to the merge-commit message which will stops student's tests from re-running. Please copy-paste to avoid typos.
For more information, refer to the documentation. If you are unsure whether to add the message or not, please ping |
Hey @jhvhs Reopening this as it still is relevant, sorry for taking so long to review this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Left a comment. Let me know if you are still interested in working on this, otherwise I can just finish the PR for you.
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ func TestOvenTime(t *testing.T) { | |||
for _, tt := range tests { | |||
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { | |||
if got := OvenTime; got != tt.expected { | |||
t.Errorf("OvenTime(%d) = %d; want %d", tt.expected, got, tt.expected) | |||
t.Errorf("OvenTime(%d) = %d; want %d", tt.time, got, tt.expected) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
t.Errorf("OvenTime(%d) = %d; want %d", tt.time, got, tt.expected) | |
t.Errorf("OvenTime = %d; want %d", got, tt.expected) |
Since OvenTime
is not a function, It's probably more appropriate to just do this.
Fix a typo
Although, both variables hold the same value, and this typo does not cause tests to fail for the wrong reason, it doesn't feel right to use the wrong variable.