Rename concept exercises

[angelikatyborska]

This PR renames concept exercises to have names based on stories, not on concepts.

I'm opening a draft PR to let you know I'm working on this.

I try to encapsulate each rename in a single commit for easier reviewing.

Renames

• booleans -> annalyns-infiltration (name from C#)
• comments -> weather-forecast
• conditionals -> blackjack
• constants -> savings-account
• errors -> deep-thought
• maps -> gross-store
• methods -> elons-toys (name from C#)
• numbers -> cars-assemble (name from C#)
• structs -> need-for-speed (name from C#)
• slices -> card-tricks
• strings -> party-robot
• strings-package -> logs-logs-logs (name from C#)
• time -> booking-up-for-beauty (name from C#)
• zero-values -> zero, zilch, nada

I can change again any name that you don't like 🙂.

I put the concepts in config.json in alphabetical order, and concept exercises in the rough order in which they will be unlocked.

This PRs also contains blurbs for all the concept exercises.

Some unexpected changes

• blackjack (prev conditionals) claimed to teach booleans, but that concept is already taught by annalyns-infiltration (prev booleans). I made blackjack require booleans instead and slightly reordered its introduction.
• Some exercises claimed to require the concept conditionals, which doesn't exist. I had to change that to either conditionals-if, conditionals-switch, or both.
• Some exercises claimed to require the concept functions, which I suspect is now part of basics. Is that correct? I removed that requirement.

[angelikatyborska]

I generated new uuids for everything I'm adding. Is that correct? I saw that there's some config.orig.json file around 🤔

[ekingery]

I agree, new UUIDs are preferable and I don't think that will cause any issues with the website? I think we can try it and see, and revert to the ones in config.orig.json as needed. I think we can also remove that file now that you've migrated the exercises over?

[ekingery]

Thanks so much for stepping in to help salvage the Go track for launch, @angelikatyborska! I added / resolved some comments and renamed a few packages, I hope that is OK/works.

[ekingery]

I agree, new UUIDs are preferable and I don't think that will cause any issues with the website? I think we can try it and see, and revert to the ones in config.orig.json as needed. I think we can also remove that file now that you've migrated the exercises over?

[angelikatyborska]

I finished all the renaming. Configlet checks are failing due to empty concept authors.

There are a lot of failures in the "exercie tests" jobs but I'm not sure if they have anything to do with this PR...

Some observations:

• some concept exercises have a go.mod file, while others don't. Is that expected?
• the logs-logs-logs (previously strings-package) exercise has an introduction that doesn't sound specific to the strings package to me, but rather to strings in general (but there already is an introduction to strings in general in party-robot). Maybe it's a wrong impression because I don't know go?
• the zero-values exercise doesn't have a story 🙊 hence its new name is just a bunch of synonyms for "zero" :D

[ekingery]

Looks great overall. I think I suggested two typo fixes, and beyond that we're good to merge. Thanks again for your celebrity guest appearance on the Go track, @angelikatyborska!

There are a lot of failures in the "exercie tests" jobs but I'm not sure if they have anything to do with this PR...

Likely unrelated, and if not we can resolve them later when someone has time to work through all of the test failures.

Some observations:

• some concept exercises have a go.mod file, while others don't. Is that expected?

I think ideally they all would use modules (and have a go.sum file), but it shouldn't prevent us from using an exercise in the meantime.

• the logs-logs-logs (previously strings-package) exercise has an introduction that doesn't sound specific to the strings package to me, but rather to strings in general (but there already is an introduction to strings in general in party-robot). Maybe it's a wrong impression because I don't know go?

Yes, good observation. It's difficult to cleanly separate the related concepts / types in Go, so I think this is probably OK for now.

• the zero-values exercise doesn't have a story speak_no_evil hence its new name is just a bunch of synonyms for "zero" :D
  0️⃣ 🥇

[angelikatyborska]

Let me see what I broke 😰

[angelikatyborska]

The cycle is between cars-assembly which teaches numbers and type-conversion, and requires conditionals-if, and blackjack which teaches conditionals-{if,switch} and requires numbers.

[ekingery]

The cycle is between cars-assembly which teaches numbers and type-conversion and requires conditionals-if and blackjack which teaches conditionals-{if,switch} and requires numbers.

That was a quick find, thanks!