-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 657
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pov: why is root not in leaves or otherwise used? #847
Comments
If it is unclear to you than it is probably unclear and we should fix. |
@shaleh do you have a fix for this? I have to admit I don't fully understand what the issue is, would you be able to expand on it so we can outline what a fix for this might look like. Thanks. |
Actually, every node is root. IMHO, it's the point of the exercise. It changes according to where you're looking from. However, you're right. Current implementation has hidden assumptions and isn't aligned with problem canonical data Anyway, we will need to write a generator for it so we can rework. @shaleh do you want to give a try ? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Since this will be solved by writing the generator and that is tracked in another issue (#605) I am closing this one. |
The sequence is:
No where in there is the value for "root" added. So when
AddArc
is called the value offrom
is unknown.The singleton test which is the first test has one leaf which matches the value of root. Most of the others use "parent" which is never explicitly defined.
The comments in the test file say that
to
will always exist but is quiet onfrom
. It seems odd that the expectation is to create missingfrom
. Or did I missed something?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: