Use LICENSE from org-wide-files repo #136
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The org-wide-files repo will submit a change to the LICENSE file in a track if it differs. This copies the LICENSE that we have in the org-wide-files in order to start with the right file in the first place.
|
Actually, I changed my mind based on exercism/org-wide-files#153 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The org-wide-files repo will submit a change to the LICENSE file
in a track if it differs.
This copies the LICENSE that we have in the org-wide-files in order
to start with the right file in the first place.
Or should I change the
bin/bootstrapscript to grab the latest LICENSE fromorg-wide-files?That seems like a better long-term strategy, actually.