Correct key-feature icons. #433
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Note: build is failing because of missing files |
Haha, a very exciting cyclical dependency loop! Is there a place I can see what these icons look like? Otherwise things seem reasonable and I'm happy to see it merged! |
TheLostLambda
approved these changes
Jul 26, 2021
|
@TheLostLambda If you look at the slack message linked in the description I believe there is a link to icons. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The icons mentioned for key features were not valid. This pull-request fixes them to match the official list of valid icons.
It also tweaks 'multiparadigm' to be 'multi-paradigm' which may be more correct.
There was not a perfect match for each but only 'inspectable' -> 'documentation' seemed a bit questionable.
Fixes: #432.