Fix #637: pass actual newlines to the exercise script, not literal '\n' strings

[filbo]

Not much to say, just run the actual test which was intended...

pull request template

---

Reviewer Resources:

Track Policies

[glennj]

Good catch!

[filbo]

Thanks, @glennj ...

I noticed that #637, the bug report, showed up on my exercism.com/journey/reputation as a 'Building Exercism' kudo; but #638, the PR, did not. I'm not complaining, just curious what rules are being followed by the system, and the thoughts behind them. (There is probably a web link which would immediately answer this...)

[IsaacG]

@filbo See https://exercism.org/docs/using/product/reputation and https://exercism.org/docs/building

I believe "building" means "contributing to the exercises in some way" even if that "way" is a tweak to a test input.

[glennj]

In your reputation, you should see You created PR#638 on bash: Fix #637: pass actual newlines to the exercise script, not literal '\n' strings with 5 reputation points.

My own reputaton journey contains

[filbo]

Yeah, my mistake, it was #638-the-PR which showed up and #637-the-bug which didn't generate any credit. Which was mildly surprising, but I see now in the guide that only major issue reports get credit. That's fine, I just needed to find the info to de-puzzle myself :)