Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use New Fideslang DSR-updated models [#1761] #2009
Use New Fideslang DSR-updated models [#1761] #2009
Changes from all commits
5f1327a
1677721
0423669
ab8a9d5
a604e6a
8117cd7
39dd611
182b947
d842448
a4089ed
b3d85b4
543ccf9
099be49
7b06e37
992c1aa
9655ef5
28c2192
ea83275
e11b22d
f51f640
c575177
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This dataset file reflects what we store in Redis. Now that we're sharing fideslang models between ops and ctl there's validation that doesn't allow data categories at the object field level - they should be on the nested fields instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is temporary, will remove when fideslang has been updated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I adjusted the fidesops_meta fields in the database datasets, but not the saas datasets to demonstrate both still work. Fideslang dataset schemas can take in both
fides_meta
andfidesops_meta
but they are converted tofides_meta
. We also don't want to break backwards compatibility with existing saas datasets.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea. Should/can the saas templates be converted over to use
fides_meta
in a future PR down the line in the unified fides resources work?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From this comment, it sounded like we wanted to preserve the backwards compatibility of this for now https://github.com/ethyca/fideslang/issues/94#issuecomment-1341175140