Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

re-introduce InboxContractConfig #122

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

blockchaindevsh
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR re-introduces the inbox contract config which was remove here.

Fixes #118 and #110.

This reverts commit bf97d60.
@blockchaindevsh blockchaindevsh force-pushed the add_back_UseInboxContract branch from 6cd314f to 1660aa2 Compare December 10, 2024 14:00
@qizhou
Copy link

qizhou commented Dec 10, 2024

Could you explain the motivation and tests that you have done?

@blockchaindevsh
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Could you explain the motivation and tests that you have done?

The inbox contract change is the main incompatible change that's causing upstream tests to fail.

By adding back the optional inbox contract config, the upstream tests should all pass.

As a result, the changes to the alt-da tests are no longer necessary, so I reverted it.

I've also locally run the alt-da tests and make verify-compat, both pass.

As for the test with our features on, they're covered by #100

@blockchaindevsh blockchaindevsh merged commit 62470c4 into op-es Dec 11, 2024
@blockchaindevsh blockchaindevsh deleted the add_back_UseInboxContract branch December 11, 2024 07:50
syntrust pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
* Revert "fix alt-da test"

This reverts commit bf97d60.

* add InboxContractConfig

* add some comment
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Optional flag for inbox contract
3 participants