Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Client: add VM execution #1028
Client: add VM execution #1028
Changes from all commits
04e9de1
8116cda
416597f
3f373e2
8ad02f8
451bba3
22af4af
75daf4b
709aa59
08e15ba
9cc4ae9
79e1095
7c68d3f
727304a
2bd2ff1
475ccfc
c0ec528
33fd42a
a29ddc5
4d2680a
e2817fe
54e1a78
28733ac
4b2d1cc
bd32047
dc2c99e
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: I don't think need the
number
type annotation since it's being initialized with0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we need
stateDB
here, since it does not seem we use it anywhere?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I put it there and not directly in
FullSynchronizer
since I thought this might be more flexible if we want to usestateDB
in other synchronizers. Do you want me to move over toFullSynchronizer
directly? Don't have a strong opinion on this myself, think these are all things which can be easily evolved and adopted further down the road.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have no strong opinion either, it is OK to keep it here for now, if we focus on the light client then we can remove it if it turns out it is unnecessary.