refill transient storage tests with updated specs on Cancun

[winsvega]

No description provided.

[chfast]

All passed by evmone.

[Demuirgos]

do these tests use the updated opcodes as well ?

[shemnon]

Yes, the opcode change is what triggered this refill.

[Demuirgos]

Yes, the opcode change is what triggered this refill.

Ah okey, are all the tests refilled? because 21 of them for some reason invoke a precompile (with address 0x0a), or is that by design?

[shemnon]

Yea, the tests need to be updated, and then refilled. 0xA is now a precompile address so these tests should fail spectacularly once we get more clients implementing it.

[winsvega]

idk what was the reason to use 0x0A as contract address in this test. I think we can change it to a different address. but lets see if it fails, the precompiles should not be redefined in pre section

[holiman]

I think we can change it to a different address. but lets see if it fails, the precompiles should not be redefined in pre section

Dunno about other clients, but for geth, it doesn't matter if a precompile "has code", we will execute the precompile, not the code associated with the account. So it's not possible to redefine them in the pre.

[shemnon]

That's the problem Besu ran into as well. We check registered precompiles before checking for code, so when the new precompile landed tests broke.