Removes MicahZoltu as EIP editor. #5418
Conversation
Context: We now have other editors who are relatively active so the response time for authors isn't as bad as it used to be (a week vs a year). It also sounds like the process for consensus changes will be moving over to the executable specs repository in the near future and since that is the piece I care most about, I am less concerned now than I used to be about the EIP process remaining credibly neutral.
|
Hi! I'm a bot, and I wanted to automerge your PR, but couldn't because of the following issue(s): (pass) .github/workflows/auto-merge-bot.yml
(fail) eip-1.md
|
| ERC_EDITORS: "@lightclient,@axic,@SamWilsn,@Pandapip1" | ||
| NETWORKING_EDITORS: "@MicahZoltu,@lightclient,@axic,@SamWilsn" | ||
| NETWORKING_EDITORS: "@lightclient,@axic,@SamWilsn" | ||
| INTERFACE_EDITORS: "@lightclient,@axic,@SamWilsn,@Pandapip1" | ||
| META_EDITORS: "@lightclient,@axic,@gcolvin,@SamWilsn,@Pandapip1" | ||
| INFORMATIONAL_EDITORS: "@lightclient,@axic,@gcolvin,@SamWilsn,@Pandapip1" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| INFORMATIONAL_EDITORS: "@lightclient,@axic,@gcolvin,@SamWilsn,@Pandapip1" | |
| INFORMATIONAL_EDITORS: "@MicahZoltu,@lightclient,@axic,@gcolvin,@SamWilsn,@Pandapip1" |
I feel like this particular change is very important. (/s obv)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In all seriousness:
- Someone else will need to be granted admin for this repository. There are enough changes that need to be manually merged, so having an active admin is essential. I propose @SamWilsn for this, since he will be the most active editor that's not me, but historically has made fewer controversial decisions than me.
- You are currently the only active maintainer of the EIP-Bot repository. I feel pretty comfortable with the codebase there, and would be happy to help maintain it. But that means that at the very least I need write access (and preferably admin).
We could probably use #5414 to manage this.
|
I agree, that the repository will need someone with write permission who is active. I second your nomination of Sam, but I believe Sam explicitly said they don't want it in the past. |
|
If you're leaving, @MicahZoltu, I'll accept write permissions. |
|
I don't have permission to give you write permissions, @poojaranjan knows how to contact the right people for that though. Need Sam added to this team: https://github.com/orgs/ethereum/teams/eip-editors |
|
If #5422 is implemented this will be a lot simpler. |
I have requested the team to do the needful. |
|
As my first, latest, and final act as Dictator of the EIP Editing process, I'm going to abuse my power and merge this without waiting for approval. 😈 Here is a picture of an innocent kitten to manipulate the emotional context that this event is stored with in your brain: |
Context: We now have other editors who are relatively active so the response time for authors isn't as bad as it used to be (a week vs a year). It also sounds like the process for consensus changes will be moving over to the executable specs repository in the near future and since that is the piece I care most about, I am less concerned now than I used to be about the EIP process remaining credibly neutral.
Context: We now have other editors who are relatively active so the response time for authors isn't as bad as it used to be (a week vs a year). It also sounds like the process for consensus changes will be moving over to the executable specs repository in the near future and since that is the piece I care most about, I am less concerned now than I used to be about the EIP process remaining credibly neutral.
I also will be unsubscribing from this repository, so someone should probably take up the the task of making sure stuff doesn't get lost in the cracks.
Note: I also reordered the Emeritus editors list to be alphabetical rather than what appeared to be random order.