Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Finalize ERC-1271 #4717

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 28, 2022
Merged

Finalize ERC-1271 #4717

merged 7 commits into from
Jan 28, 2022

Conversation

PhABC
Copy link
Contributor

@PhABC PhABC commented Jan 24, 2022

Well beyond the last-call deadline. Time to cement this and make it final.

@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Jan 24, 2022

All tests passed; auto-merging...

(pass) eip-1271.md

classification
updateEIP
  • passed!

Copy link
Contributor

@MicahZoltu MicahZoltu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Simple Summary has been deprecated in favor of a description metadata field. In this case, you should also shorten it down to about a sentence, consider something like this:

description: A standard way for contracts to verify if a provided signature is valid when the account is a smart contract.

EIP links should be relative, change

[EIP-712](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-712)

to

[EIP-712](./eip-712.md)

PhABC added a commit to PhABC/EIPs that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2022
@PhABC
Copy link
Contributor Author

PhABC commented Jan 25, 2022

@MicahZoltu thanks! Updated both

@lightclient
Copy link
Member

@PhABC could you please move "Security Considerations" below "Reference Implementation"? Other than that, I think it looks good on my end.

PhABC and others added 6 commits January 25, 2022 11:11
Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:

 - It only modifies existing Draft, Review, or Last Call EIP(s)
 - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
 - The build is passing
* Update eip-2315.md

* Update eip-2315.md
* Update eip-4573.md

* formatting eqn

* Update eip-4573.md
* preview functions

* swap preview
Well beyond the last-call deadline. Time to cement this and make it final.
@PhABC
Copy link
Contributor Author

PhABC commented Jan 25, 2022

@lightclient Done and rebased PR branch off master

Copy link
Member

@lightclient lightclient left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Glad to see this finalized.

@PhABC
Copy link
Contributor Author

PhABC commented Jan 27, 2022

Any reason why this isn’t getting merged? Looks like CI is stuck.

@MicahZoltu MicahZoltu closed this Jan 28, 2022
auto-merge was automatically disabled January 28, 2022 14:12

Pull request was closed

@MicahZoltu MicahZoltu reopened this Jan 28, 2022
@eth-bot eth-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) January 28, 2022 14:13
@eth-bot eth-bot merged commit c8e80ba into ethereum:master Jan 28, 2022
PowerStream3604 pushed a commit to PowerStream3604/EIPs that referenced this pull request May 19, 2022
* Fix date

* Automatically merged updates to draft EIP(s) 3416 (ethereum#3446)


Hi, I'm a bot! This change was automatically merged because:

 - It only modifies existing Draft, Review, or Last Call EIP(s)
 - The PR was approved or written by at least one author of each modified EIP
 - The build is passing

* Update eip-2315.md (ethereum#3760)

* Update eip-2315.md

* Update eip-2315.md

* Update eip-4573.md (ethereum#4680)

* Update eip-4573.md

* formatting eqn

* Update eip-4573.md

* EIP-4626: Preview functions (ethereum#4705)

* preview functions

* swap preview

* Finalize ERC-1271

Well beyond the last-call deadline. Time to cement this and make it final.

Co-authored-by: hexzorro <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Greg Colvin <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alberto Cuesta Cañada <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants