Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(op-dispute-mon): Bind Extraction Enrichers #9908

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 19, 2024

Conversation

refcell
Copy link
Contributor

@refcell refcell commented Mar 19, 2024

Description

Small pr to bind the various extractor enrichment components to the Enricher interface to assert the interface on enricher implementations.

Copy link
Contributor Author

refcell commented Mar 19, 2024

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @refcell and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

@refcell refcell changed the title chore(op-dispute-mon): bind enrichers chore(op-dispute-mon): Bind Extraction Enrichers Mar 19, 2024
@refcell refcell requested review from ajsutton, clabby and Inphi March 19, 2024 16:47
@refcell refcell added C-chore Category: Code, docs or tooling maintenance A-op-dispute-mon Area: op-dispute-mon related labels Mar 19, 2024 — with Graphite App
@refcell refcell self-assigned this Mar 19, 2024
@refcell refcell requested a review from smartcontracts March 19, 2024 16:47
@refcell refcell marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2024 16:47
@refcell refcell requested a review from a team as a code owner March 19, 2024 16:47
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 19, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The overall change involves minor structural adjustments and the addition of type assertions for the Enricher interface across three files within the project. These modifications include cleaning up unnecessary whitespace, restructuring struct declarations for brevity, and ensuring that specific structs assert their compatibility with the Enricher interface. These changes aim to enhance code readability and enforce interface implementation, without significantly altering the underlying logic of the components.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../extract/balance_enricher.go Removed unnecessary whitespace in BalanceEnricher struct; added Enricher interface type assertion.
.../extract/bond_enricher.go Added Enricher interface type assertion; restructured BondEnricher struct declaration.
.../extract/head_enricher.go Added Enricher interface type assertion for L1HeadBlockNumEnricher.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@Inphi Inphi added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 19, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 96a269b Mar 19, 2024
70 checks passed
@Inphi Inphi deleted the refcell/enricher-bindings branch March 19, 2024 18:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-op-dispute-mon Area: op-dispute-mon related C-chore Category: Code, docs or tooling maintenance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants