Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

show block number when "L2 safe head ahead of L2 unsafe head" happens #12030

Conversation

zhiqiangxu
Copy link
Contributor

It's very helpful when analyzing reorgs.

Previously submitted here, but was closed because stale.

@zhiqiangxu zhiqiangxu requested review from a team as code owners September 20, 2024 08:03
@zhiqiangxu zhiqiangxu force-pushed the fix_log_calculateL2BlockRangeToStore branch from 2b5c0a8 to 403ff9f Compare September 20, 2024 08:04
@zhiqiangxu zhiqiangxu force-pushed the fix_log_calculateL2BlockRangeToStore branch from 403ff9f to cb7af27 Compare September 20, 2024 08:10
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.87%. Comparing base (fbf69c9) to head (cb7af27).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #12030      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    79.10%   78.87%   -0.24%     
===========================================
  Files           41       41              
  Lines         3437     3437              
===========================================
- Hits          2719     2711       -8     
- Misses         548      557       +9     
+ Partials       170      169       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
cannon-go-tests 78.87% <ø> (-0.24%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@axelKingsley
Copy link
Contributor

I see an action test failed, I've rerun the suite in case it's a flakey test.

@axelKingsley axelKingsley added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 20, 2024
Merged via the queue into ethereum-optimism:develop with commit bd50ac6 Sep 20, 2024
61 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants