op-node: Record genesis as being safe from L1 genesis

op-e2e/actions/safedb_test.go

@@ -59,9 +59,11 @@ func TestRecordSafeHeadUpdates(gt *testing.T) {
 	require.Equal(t, eth.HeaderBlockID(l1Head), response.L1Block)
 	require.Equal(t, verifier.L2Unsafe().ID(), response.SafeHead)
 
-	// Should get not found error before the L1 block because we have no earlier safe head recorded
-	_, err = verifier.RollupClient().SafeHeadAtL1Block(context.Background(), firstSafeHeadUpdateL1Block-1)
-	require.ErrorContains(t, err, safedb.ErrNotFound.Error())
+	// Only genesis is safe at this point
+	response, err = verifier.RollupClient().SafeHeadAtL1Block(context.Background(), firstSafeHeadUpdateL1Block-1)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	require.Equal(t, eth.HeaderBlockID(miner.l1Chain.Genesis().Header()), response.L1Block)
+	require.Equal(t, sd.RollupCfg.Genesis.L2, response.SafeHead)
 
 	// orphan the L1 block that included the batch tx, and build a new different L1 block
 	miner.ActL1RewindToParent(t)
@@ -78,9 +80,11 @@ func TestRecordSafeHeadUpdates(gt *testing.T) {
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	require.Equal(t, verifier.L2Safe(), ref, "verifier engine matches rollup client")
 
-	// The safe head has been reorged so the record should have been deleted
+	// The safe head has been reorged so the record should have been deleted, leaving us back with just genesis safe
 	response, err = verifier.RollupClient().SafeHeadAtL1Block(context.Background(), firstSafeHeadUpdateL1Block)
-	require.ErrorContainsf(t, err, safedb.ErrNotFound.Error(), "Expected error but got %v", response)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+	require.Equal(t, eth.HeaderBlockID(miner.l1Chain.Genesis().Header()), response.L1Block)
+	require.Equal(t, sd.RollupCfg.Genesis.L2, response.SafeHead)
 
 	// Now replay the batch tx in a new L1 block
 	miner.ActL1StartBlock(12)(t)

op-e2e/faultproofs/output_cannon_test.go

@@ -693,20 +693,10 @@ func TestInvalidateUnsafeProposal(t *testing.T) {
 		test := test
 		t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
 			op_e2e.InitParallel(t, op_e2e.UsesCannon)
-			sys, l1Client := startFaultDisputeSystem(t, withSequencerWindowSize(100000))
+			sys, l1Client := startFaultDisputeSystem(t, withSequencerWindowSize(100000), withBatcherStopped())
 			t.Cleanup(sys.Close)
 
-			// Wait for the safe head to advance at least one block to init the safe head database
-			require.NoError(t, wait.ForSafeBlock(ctx, sys.RollupClient("sequencer"), 1))
-
-			// Now stop the batcher so the safe head doesn't advance any further
-			require.NoError(t, sys.BatchSubmitter.Stop(ctx))
-
-			// Wait for the unsafe head to advance to be sure it is beyond the safe head
-			require.NoError(t, wait.ForNextBlock(ctx, sys.NodeClient("sequencer")))
-			blockNum, err := sys.NodeClient("sequencer").BlockNumber(ctx)
-			require.NoError(t, err)
-
+			blockNum := uint64(1)
 			disputeGameFactory := disputegame.NewFactoryHelper(t, ctx, sys)
 			// Root claim is _dishonest_ because the required data is not available on L1
 			game := disputeGameFactory.StartOutputCannonGameWithCorrectRoot(ctx, "sequencer", blockNum, disputegame.WithUnsafeProposal())
@@ -768,9 +758,6 @@ func TestInvalidateProposalForFutureBlock(t *testing.T) {
 			sys, l1Client := startFaultDisputeSystem(t, withSequencerWindowSize(100000))
 			t.Cleanup(sys.Close)
 
-			// Wait for the safe head to advance at least one block to init the safe head database
-			require.NoError(t, wait.ForSafeBlock(ctx, sys.RollupClient("sequencer"), 1))
-
 			farFutureBlockNum := uint64(10_000_000)
 			disputeGameFactory := disputegame.NewFactoryHelper(t, ctx, sys)
 			// Root claim is _dishonest_ because the required data is not available on L1

op-node/rollup/derive/engine_queue.go

@@ -705,6 +705,20 @@ func (eq *EngineQueue) Reset(ctx context.Context, _ eth.L1BlockRef, _ eth.System
 	if err := eq.safeHeadNotifs.SafeHeadReset(safe); err != nil {
 		return err
 	}
+	if safe.Number == eq.cfg.Genesis.L2.Number && safe.Hash == eq.cfg.Genesis.L2.Hash {
+		// The rollup genesis block is always safe by definition. So if the pipeline resets this far back we know
+		// we will process all safe head updates and can record genesis as always safe from L1 genesis.
+		// Note that it is not safe to use cfg.Genesis.L1 here as it is the block immediately before the L2 genesis
+		// but the contracts may have been deployed earlier than that, allowing creating a dispute game
+		// with a L1 head prior to cfg.Genesis.L1
+		l1Genesis, err := eq.l1Fetcher.L1BlockRefByNumber(ctx, 0)
+		if err != nil {
+			return fmt.Errorf("failed to retrieve L1 genesis: %w", err)
+		}
+		if err := eq.safeHeadNotifs.SafeHeadUpdated(safe, l1Genesis.ID()); err != nil {
+			return err
+		}
+	}
 	eq.logSyncProgress("reset derivation work")
 	return io.EOF
 }

op-node/rollup/derive/engine_queue_test.go

@@ -898,6 +898,7 @@ func TestBlockBuildingRace(t *testing.T) {
 	l1F.ExpectL1BlockRefByNumber(refA.Number, refA, nil)
 	l1F.ExpectL1BlockRefByHash(refA.Hash, refA, nil)
 	l1F.ExpectL1BlockRefByHash(refA.Hash, refA, nil)
+	l1F.ExpectL1BlockRefByNumber(0, refA, nil)
 
 	eng.ExpectSystemConfigByL2Hash(refA0.Hash, cfg.Genesis.SystemConfig, nil)
 
@@ -1023,6 +1024,7 @@ func TestResetLoop(t *testing.T) {
 
 	rng := rand.New(rand.NewSource(1234))
 
+	l1Genesis := eth.L1BlockRef{Number: 0}
 	refA := testutils.RandomBlockRef(rng)
 	refA0 := eth.L2BlockRef{
 		Hash:           testutils.RandomHash(rng),
@@ -1080,6 +1082,7 @@ func TestResetLoop(t *testing.T) {
 	eng.ExpectL2BlockRefByHash(refA1.Hash, refA1, nil)
 	eng.ExpectL2BlockRefByHash(refA0.Hash, refA0, nil)
 	eng.ExpectSystemConfigByL2Hash(refA0.Hash, cfg.Genesis.SystemConfig, nil)
+	l1F.ExpectL1BlockRefByNumber(0, l1Genesis, nil)
 	l1F.ExpectL1BlockRefByNumber(refA.Number, refA, nil)
 	l1F.ExpectL1BlockRefByHash(refA.Hash, refA, nil)
 	l1F.ExpectL1BlockRefByHash(refA.Hash, refA, nil)