-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 189
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Charge unit in espresso #3633
Comments
I guess the prefactor definition is wrong on the documentation webpage in that it should be eo**2/(4piepsilon0epsilonr). This makes it equal to lBkBT and for temperature =1 (in hoomd units), the prefactor is 2 for a sigma value of 0.35 and a Bjerrum length of 0.7 nm, which is the case for water. |
Indeed, the documentation under http://espressomd.org/html/doc/electrostatics.html is inconsistent. C should be equal to C=eo**2/(4piepsilon0epsilonr) in equation (1) and the equation before needs to be adapated (via using valencies z_i=q_i/e_0) |
Should we fix this or not? |
Yes, for clarity this should be fixed. |
Description of changes: - remove CUDA installation instructions on OSX (follow-up to #3652) - update links to dockerfiles for non-Ubuntu OSes - correct the Coulomb prefactor formula (fixes #3633) - in electrostatics scripts, replace magic values by their full expressions - document the difference between serial and parallel versions of `libhdf5-dev` (fixes #3656) - improve documentation of the script that shows the effect of MPI and `node_grid` on domain decomposition (see mailing list email "dividing simulation box using MPI" from 2020-04-20)
While going through the page on electrostatics, I realized that the prefactor should be KTlB/(eo**2) instead of kTlB as suggested by the package. Most example programs have mentioned the prefactor to be 2 and the charges to be integers. How do these charges connect to the electronic charge?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: