Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Xtensa patches (11.x) (Do not merge, PR created for easier review only) (LLVM-89) #42

Closed
wants to merge 80 commits into from

Conversation

igrr
Copy link
Member

@igrr igrr commented Nov 30, 2020

This PR allows reviewing Xtensa patches on top of release/11.x branch.

Add Xtensa.td, XtensaInstrInfo.td etc. Currently add just part of Core
Instructions like ALU, processor control, memory barrier and some move
instructions. Add instructions formats and basic registers.
Add instruction printer and basic tests of the
Xtensa instructions.
Add relocations and fixups support in object files generation.
Modify tests to support new instructions. Add tests for relocations
and fixups.
Lower ConstantPool, GlobalAddress, BlockAddress and JumpTable.
Implement lowering of External and JumpTable symbols to MCInst
representation.
Also lower SHL, SRA, SRL with register operands.
Implement load unsigned 8-bit pseudo operation. Implement
extending loads patterns extloadi1/i8/i16.
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Xtensa patches (11.x) (Do not merge, PR created for easier review only) Xtensa patches (11.x) (Do not merge, PR created for easier review only) (LLVM-89) May 10, 2021
andreisfr and others added 4 commits May 31, 2021 16:40
Modified linker options. Added "no-rtti" directory to library search path  in case of -fno-rtti option is in arguments.
Added "-lgcc" option.
Add job which builds toolchain for windows.
Change gcc toolchain release and use new version
of the build scripts.
@gerekon gerekon closed this Aug 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants