Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed error in "touch_ll_get_sleep_time" function for ESP32 (IDFGH-5111) #6895

Closed

Conversation

FoxKeys
Copy link
Contributor

@FoxKeys FoxKeys commented Apr 18, 2021

Because of this bug touch_hal_get_sleep_time() returns wrong value (both, sleep_cycle and meas_cycle filled with meas_cycle). As result, touch_pad_get_meas_time returns wrong sleep_cycle too.
Additional, bad side effect, touch_pad_config() makes wrong vTaskDelay() (because delay based on values returned by touch_pad_get_meas_time())

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Apr 18, 2021

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@espressif-bot espressif-bot added the Status: Opened Issue is new label Apr 18, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title Fixed error in "touch_ll_get_sleep_time" function for ESP32 Fixed error in "touch_ll_get_sleep_time" function for ESP32 (IDFGH-5111) Apr 18, 2021
@Alvin1Zhang
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your contribution.

@espressif-bot espressif-bot added Status: In Progress Work is in progress and removed Status: Opened Issue is new labels Apr 21, 2021
@espressif-bot espressif-bot added Status: Done Issue is done internally Resolution: Done Issue is done internally and removed Status: In Progress Work is in progress labels May 26, 2021
@Alvin1Zhang
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for contribution again, changes merged with 850de61.

@Alvin1Zhang Alvin1Zhang closed this Jun 8, 2021
@FoxKeys FoxKeys deleted the fix_touch_ll_get_sleep_time branch June 8, 2021 06:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Resolution: Done Issue is done internally Status: Done Issue is done internally
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants