-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Include hidden SSID's, scan lists of APs #3464
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks hacky, what is its purpose?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The standard WiFiMulti code will scan for all SSID it can see, and connected you to one that you have requested if it is available... It will show you some information about the hidden SSID, BUT! if the SSID your requesting is hidden, it will NOT connect you to that SSID. The logic in the code is wrong.
The modification we made to WiFiMulti in the pull request above, will connect you to a hidden SSID if it is available....
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The lower level implementation details of WiFi.disconnect() are not available for me to examine and determine why the delay is required. Through numerous experiments on a number of secured, unsecured, hidden, and visible SSIDs the delay creates a high degree of success when trying subsequent network connections. The delay put in place when connecting to hidden SSID's was also determined experimentally and results in successful connections almost every time. Removing the delay causes the connections to fail due to the asynchronous nature of the lower level wifi drivers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This sounds like an esp32 equivalent to esp8266/Arduino#4372
I have not encountered this issue on esp32, do you have demo code. I suggest the actual problem be investigated. This comment however was specifically aimed at
WiFi.persistent(false);
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My esp32 is not responding