Allow set_power_saving
even for coex
#3081
Merged
+11
−10
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thank you for your contribution!
We appreciate the time and effort you've put into this pull request.
To help us review it efficiently, please ensure you've gone through the following checklist:
Submission Checklist 📝
cargo xtask fmt-packages
command to ensure that all changed code is formatted correctly.CHANGELOG.md
in the proper section.Extra:
Pull Request Details 📖
Description
I think there was a good reason not to allow any other PS than
Min
for COEX before but it turns out it's fine to set it at least toNone
and in the case of ESP32-C6 it's almost unusable with any other PSI changed some (two) examples to set
PowerSavingMode::None
- could be applied to more / all examples.We could also now turn
coex
into a config-option (since it doesn't change the API surface anymore)This should be the solution for #3049 on ESP32-C6 but unfortunately doesn't help with ESP32 (so not closing it via this)
Testing
Run the
wifi_coex
example