Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve validation messages for SEO & metadata fields #750

Closed
SvSven opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Improve validation messages for SEO & metadata fields #750

SvSven opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
👨‍💻 planning 🚀 ready to deploy Use this if issue is ready to be deployed Sanity Depend on or follow up with

Comments

@SvSven
Copy link
Contributor

SvSven commented Jan 19, 2022

The validation labels used for the SEO & metadata fields can be made more clear and consistent.

image.png

For example the use of The document title is very important for SEO alongside Meta description is important for SEO is a bit strange.

Similarly Please pay attention to SEO could be written better, for example something along the lines of It is recommended to fill out the SEO fields whenever possible.

Needs input from @BirteThornquist

Easy to fix if we can agree on better texts

@meols
Copy link
Collaborator

meols commented Jul 22, 2024

I see the "yellow triangle" with explanatory text on news and magazine templates, and the texts are OK. But we don't have the "yellow triangles on topic pages. Topic pages are where focus the most on SEO.

@millianapia
Copy link
Contributor

as text is ok, i will move this forward but have created a bug for the warning not being in the top for topic pages #2442

@millianapia millianapia added the 🚀 ready to deploy Use this if issue is ready to be deployed label Aug 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
👨‍💻 planning 🚀 ready to deploy Use this if issue is ready to be deployed Sanity Depend on or follow up with
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants