Consistently use dot prefix for internal functions #369
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
joshwlambert
force-pushed
the
dot-prefix
branch
from
3a86eef to
a986d56
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR addresses #344 by adding a dot prefix (
.<func>()) to internal functions that previously did not use one. This is to improve the consistency and standardisation of the {epiparameter} API. The single internal functions that does not follow this style,new_epiparameter(), has been explained in thedesign_principles.Rmdvignette.This should not be a breaking change as all changes affect non-user-facing functions.